CJA
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a scholarly reply
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Okutomi, T.
Right arrow Articles by Hoka, S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Okutomi, T.
Right arrow Articles by Hoka, S.

Canadian Journal of Anesthesia, Vol 46, 930-934, Copyright © 1999 by Canadian Anesthesiologists' Society


ARTICLES

Saline volume and local anesthetic concentration modify the spread of epidural anesthesia

T Okutomi, M Minakawa and S Hoka
Department of Anesthesiology, Kitasato University School of Medicine, Sagamihara, Kanagawa, Japan.

PURPOSE: To examine the effects of the volume of saline and the concentration of local anesthetic on the quality of anesthetic level. METHODS: One hundred and fifty two patients received thoracic epidural anesthesia were allocated into two groups; mepivacaine 1% (75 patients) and 1.5% (77 patients). Each group was randomly divided into three subgroups depending on epidural saline volumes of 1 ml, 5 ml, or 10 ml. Fifteen minutes after the injection of 10 ml mepivacaine, the dermatome levels of hypesthesia to cold and pinprick were determined by an individual blinded to the saline volume. RESULTS: The number of spinal segments with hypesthesia to cold in the three subgroups in the mepivacaine 1% group were 12.5 [6-20], 13 [8.5-20.5] and 12.5 [6.5-22], respectively (median [range]). The segments in the mepivacaine 1.5% group were 12 [7-18.5], 14 [8.5-19]* and 15 [6-23]*, respectively (*P < 0.05 vs 1-ml group). The number of spinal segments with hypesthesia for pinprick in the three subgroups in the 1% mepivacaine group were 10.5 [2-22], 10.5 [4-17] and 11 [4-19], respectively. The segments in the mepivacaine 1.5% group were 12 [7.5-16], 12 [7.5-17] and 11.5 [5-22.5], respectively. Saline volume did not alter the anesthetic level of the mepivacaine 1%, although it did affect the anesthetic spread of the mepivacaine 1.5%. In both groups, a differential nerve block was elicited in the 5 ml and 10 ml saline subgroups. CONCLUSION: When a large volume of saline is administered prior to local anesthetic, more differential blockade and a greater extent of anesthesia may be elicited.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Anesth. Analg.Home page
W. A. Visser, R. A. Lee, and M. J. M. Gielen
Factors Affecting the Distribution of Neural Blockade by Local Anesthetics in Epidural Anesthesia and a Comparison of Lumbar Versus Thoracic Epidural Anesthesia
Anesth. Analg., August 1, 2008; 107(2): 708 - 721.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1999 by the Canadian Anesthesiologists' Society.