CJA
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a scholarly reply
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Littleford, J. A.
Right arrow Articles by Georgoussis, S. E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Littleford, J. A.
Right arrow Articles by Georgoussis, S. E.

Canadian Journal of Anesthesia, Vol 46, 1057-1063, Copyright © 1999 by Canadian Anesthesiologists' Society

ARTICLES

Obstetrical anesthesia for a parturient with a ventriculoperitoneal shunt and third ventriculostomy

JA Littleford, NJ Brockhurst, EP Bernstein and SE Georgoussis
Department of Anesthesia, Mount Sinai Hospital and The University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada. jlittleford@torhosp.toronto.on.ca

PURPOSE: To describe the anesthetic considerations for a primiparous woman whose history included four neurosurgeries: ventriculoperitoneal (VP) shunt insertion, evacuation of a subdural hematoma, shunt revision, and third ventriculostomy for hydrocephalus secondary to aqueductal stenosis. CLINICAL FEATURES: A 37-yr-old GI, P0 woman with a VP shunt and third ventriculostomy was assessed in the Obstetrical Anesthesia Clinic at 36 wk. gestation to consider analgesic options for labour and delivery and review anesthetic management in the event that an operative delivery was required. A third ventriculostomy had been performed when increased intracranial pressure and neurological symptoms reappeared despite the previous VP shunt. Pregnancy was uneventful and vaginal delivery was anticipated. She presented in spontaneous labour at 40 wk. gestation. She declined analgesia throughout her four and a half hour labour A mediolateral episiotomy was performed to facilitate spontaneous delivery of a 4,182 g female infant. Mother and baby were discharged home without incident after two days. She denied any problems, including headaches, on follow up at two and four weeks. CONCLUSION: A review of the literature concerning pregnant patients with shunts found that both regional and general anesthesia has been used with no reports of complications directly related to anesthesia. No published cases describing labour analgesia for patients with third ventriculostomy were found. Two neurosurgeons advised that regional anesthesia was not contraindicated in such patients and that analgesia should be based on obstetrical considerations and the neurological status of the patient.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Anesth. Analg.Home page
L. P. Wang and M. J. Paech
Neuroanesthesia for the Pregnant Woman
Anesth. Analg., July 1, 2008; 107(1): 193 - 200.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1999 by the Canadian Anesthesiologists' Society.