Canadian Journal of Anesthesia, Vol 46, 1064-1066, Copyright © 1999 by Canadian Anesthesiologists' Society

ARTICLES

Water flow between the upper esophagus and pharynx for the LMA and COPA in fresh cadavers. Laryngeal mask airway, and cuffed oropharyngeal airway

J Brimacombe and C Keller
Department of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care Medicine, Leopold-Franzens University, Innsbruck, Austria. 100236,2343@compuserve.com

PURPOSE: In this randomised, crossover cadaver study, we determine the esophageal pressure (EP) at which water flow occurs between the upper esophagus and pharynx for the laryngeal mask airway (LMA) and cuffed oropharyngeal airway (COPA). METHODS: Ten male and ten female cadavers were studied. The infusion set of a pressure controlled, continuous flow pump was inserted into the upper esophagus and ligated into place. The EP was increased in 2 cm H2O increments. This was performed without an airway device (controls) and over a range of cuff volumes for the LMA (0-40 ml) and COPA (0-60 ml). Regurgitation pressure (RP) was the EP at which fluid was first seen with a fibreoptic scope in the hypopharynx (controls) and above or below the cuff (LMA and COPA). RESULTS: The RP was higher for the LMA than for the COPA and controls (P<0.0004), and RP was similar for COPA and controls. There was an increase in RP with increasing cuff volume for the LMA from 0 to 10 ml (P<0.0001). There were no increases in RP with increasing cuff volume for the COPA. The EP at which fluid leaked above and below the cuff was similar for the LMA at all cuff volumes. The EP at which fluid leaked above the cuff was higher than below the cuff for the COPA when the cuff volume was 40 ml (P<0.0001). CONCLUSION: In fresh cadavers, the LMA provides better airway protection from fluid in the upper esophagus than the COPA.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				D. M. Miller A Proposed Classification and Scoring System for Supraglottic Sealing Airways: A Brief Review Anesth. Analg., November 1, 2004; 99(5): 1553 - 1559. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				V. Dimitriou, G. S. Voyagis, C. Iatrou, and J. Brimacombe The PAxpressTM is an effective ventilatory device but has an 18% failure rate for flexible lightwand-guided tracheal intubation in anesthetized paralyzed patients: [Le PAxpressTM est un appareil de ventilation efficace, mais presente un taux d'echec de 18 % pour l'intubation tracheale sous guidage lumineux flexible chez les patients anesthesies paralyses] Can J Anesth, May 1, 2003; 50(5): 495 - 500. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. R. Maltby, M. T. Beriault, N. C. Watson, D. J. Liepert, and G. H. Fick LMA-ClassicTM and LMA-ProSealTM are effective alternatives to endotracheal intubation for gynecologic laparoscopy: [Le ML ClassiqueTM et le ML ProSealTM peuvent remplacer efficacement l'intubation endotracheale pour la laparoscopie gynecologique] Can J Anesth, January 1, 2003; 50(1): 71 - 77. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. Brimacombe, C. Keller, W. Roth, and A. Loeckinger Large cuff volumes impede posterior pharyngeal mucosal perfusion with the laryngeal tube airway: [Un ballonnet de grand volume gene la perfusion de la muqueuse pharyngienne posterieure realisee avec le tube d'intubation laryngee] Can J Anesth, December 1, 2002; 49(10): 1084 - 1087. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				N. R. Evans, R. L. Llewellyn, S. V. Gardner, and M. F.M. James Aspiration prevented by the ProSealTM laryngeal mask airway: a case report: [Prevention de l'aspiration par le masque larynge ProSealTM : une etude de cas] Can J Anesth, April 1, 2002; 49(4): 413 - 416. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]