CJA
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a scholarly reply
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Vaghadia, H.
Right arrow Articles by Fowler, C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Vaghadia, H.
Right arrow Articles by Fowler, C.

Canadian Journal of Anesthesia, Vol 46, 1117-1121, Copyright © 1999 by Canadian Anesthesiologists' Society

ARTICLES

Can nurses screen all outpatients? Performance of a nurse based model

H Vaghadia and C Fowler
Department of Health Care & Epidemiology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada. hvaghadi@vanhosp.bc.ca

PURPOSE: This paper outlines and evaluates a nurse based model for screening outpatients that is utilized in our free standing Surgical Day Care Centre (SDCC). METHODS: For 668 outpatients presenting at our SDCC, the attending anesthesiologist completed a study survey that was designed to identify: completeness of history; important concerns as judged by the pre-admission nurse; whether the patient was seen in the anesthesia preadmission clinic (PAC) for a consultation; if there was a delay in SDCC, the duration and reasons for the delay; whether in the opinion of the attending anesthesiologist the patient should have had an anesthetic consultation; whether the patient was canceled and the reason for cancellation. RESULTS: A nurse based model for screening all outpatients in a university affiliated tertiary hospital day care unit had an accuracy of 81%, specificity of 86%, sensitivity of 46% and a negative predictive value of 92%. The cancellation rate with this model was 1.4%(8/551) and the case delay rate was 3.4%(19/551). The referral rate to anesthesiology staff was 17.5%(117/668) and the referral rate to the PAC for anesthetic consultation was 5.1%(34/668). CONCLUSIONS: The use of the nurse based model allowed for the efficient use of anesthesia and surgical day care centre resources. The model was better at 'ruling out' patients who do not need to be seen by anesthesiology ahead of the day of surgery rather than 'ruling in' patients who need to be seen by anesthesiology.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Br J AnaesthHome page
L. C. Lemmens, H. E. Kerkkamp, W. A. van Klei, N. S. Klazinga, C. L. Rutten, R. H. van Linge, and K. G. Moons
Implementation of outpatient preoperative evaluation clinics: facilitating and limiting factors
Br. J. Anaesth., May 1, 2008; 100(5): 645 - 651.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Br J AnaesthHome page
G. M. Edward, S. F. Das, S. G. Elkhuizen, P. J. M. Bakker, J. A. M. Hontelez, M. W. Hollmann, B. Preckel, and L. C. Lemaire
Simulation to analyse planning difficulties at the preoperative assessment clinic
Br. J. Anaesth., February 1, 2008; 100(2): 195 - 202.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Anesth. Analg.Home page
L. R. Ferrari
Preoperative Evaluation of Pediatric Surgical Patients with Multisystem Considerations
Anesth. Analg., October 1, 2004; 99(4): 1058 - 1069.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Canadian J. AnesthesiaHome page
M. F. Roizen
Preoperative laboratory testing: necessary or overkill?
Can J Anesth, June 1, 2004; 51(suppl_1): R13 - R13.
[Full Text] [PDF]


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1999 by the Canadian Anesthesiologists' Society.