CJA
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a scholarly reply
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Chung, D. C.
Right arrow Articles by Kong, A. S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Chung, D. C.
Right arrow Articles by Kong, A. S.

Canadian Journal of Anesthesia, Vol 46, 215-219, Copyright © 1999 by Canadian Anesthesiologists' Society

ARTICLES

Anesthesia of the airway by aspiration of lidocaine

DC Chung, PA Mainland and AS Kong
Department of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care, Chinese University of Hong Kong, Prince of Wales Hospital, Shatin, China.

PURPOSE: Lidocaine instilled onto to the back of the tongue of a supine subject and aspirated has been reported to provide effective topical anesthesia of the airway. The purpose of this study was to observe endoscopically the fate of lidocaine so instilled and document the efficacy of anesthesia for awake fibreoptic intubation. METHODS: In Part I of the study, a fibreoptic bronchoscope was positioned in the pharynx of three volunteers lying supine and the route followed by tinted lidocaine solution instilled onto the back of the protruded tongue during mouth breathing was observed. In Part 2, the airway of 39 patients requiring awake fibreoptic intubation was anesthetized by having them gargle twice with 5 ml lidocaine 2%, followed by instillation of 0.2 ml-kg(-1) or 20 ml lidocaine 1.5% (whichever was less) onto the dorsum of their tongues as described above. The efficacy of anesthesia was scored by the patient reaction (coughing or gagging) to instrumentation in the pharynx, at the glottis, and in the trachea; to passage of the tracheal tube into the trachea; and to the presence of the tube in the trachea. RESULTS: Lidocaine instilled on to the back of the tongue was swallowed initially but ultimately pooled in the pharynx and was aspirated. In all patients the trachea was intubated without requiring supplemental lidocaine, and all but one patient tolerated the tracheal tube in situ. CONCLUSION: A combination of lidocaine gargles and lidocaine instilled on to the back of the tongue and aspirated provides effective anesthesia of the pharynx, larynx, and trachea for awake fibreoptic intubation.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Canadian J. AnesthesiaHome page
A. M. H. Ho, D. C. Chung, E. W. H. To, and M. K. Karmakar
Total airway obstruction during local anesthesia in a non-sedated patient with a compromised airway: [Une obstruction totale des voies aeriennes pendant une anesthesie locale chez un patient eveille qui presentait deja une obstruction respiratoire partielle]
Can J Anesth, October 1, 2004; 51(8): 838 - 841.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Canadian J. AnesthesiaHome page
J. C. Drummond, D.C. Chung, M Cohen, and D Wigglesworth
Airway anesthesia: the toothpaste method
Can J Anesth, January 1, 2000; 47(1): 94 - 94.
[Full Text] [PDF]


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1999 by the Canadian Anesthesiologists' Society.