CJA
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a scholarly reply
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Tsui, B. C.
Right arrow Articles by Finucane, B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Tsui, B. C.
Right arrow Articles by Finucane, B.

Canadian Journal of Anesthesia, Vol 46, 675-678, Copyright © 1999 by Canadian Anesthesiologists' Society


ARTICLES

Detection of subarachnoid and intravascular epidural catheter placement

BC Tsui, S Gupta and B Finucane
Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, University of Alberta and affiliated Hospitals (University of Alberta Hospital and Royal Alexander Hospital), 3B2.32 Walter Mackenzie Health Sciences Centre, Edmonton, Canada. btsui@pop.srv.ulberta.ca

PURPOSE: To report the detection of subarachnoid and intravascular catheter placement using nerve stimulation through an epidural catheter. CLINICAL FEATURES: Electrical stimulation (1-10 mA) was applied through the catheter. A positive motor response (truncal or limb movement) indicated that the catheter was in the epidural space. Absence of a motor response indicated that it was not. A low milliamperage (<1 mA) with bilateral response indicated subarachnoid placement. Intravascular catheter placement was indicated by a positive response to the test, which remains at or returns to the baseline levels (i.e. prior to any local anesthetic injection), despite the administration of local anesthetics. In the first patient, the test confirmed subarachnoid catheter placement during attempts at continuous spinal anaesthesia even though CSF could not be aspirated. Bilateral motor response in the legs was observed at 0.2 mA. In the second patient, inadvertent subarachnoid placement was detected during attempted lumbar epidural block by observing bilateral motor response in the legs at 0.3 mA. In the third patient, intravascular placement was suspected and confirmed by failure to obliterate the motor response despite repeated local anesthetic injection. CONCLUSION: The new test provides objective information in managing epidural catheters when their position is uncertain.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Canadian J. AnesthesiaHome page
P. Morley-Forster, B. Tsui, S. Ganapathy, and A. Abotaiban
REPLY
Can J Anesth, September 1, 2006; 53(9): 965 - 966.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Anesth. Analg.Home page
B. C. H. Tsui
Epidural stimulation test criteria.
Anesth. Analg., September 1, 2006; 103(3): 775 - 776.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Anesth. Analg.Home page
B. C. H. Tsui
Is It Time to Perform All Thoracic Epidural Placements Under Fluoroscopy?
Anesth. Analg., May 1, 2006; 102(5): 1586 - 1586.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Br J AnaesthHome page
B. C. H. Tsui
Epidural stimulation test vs epidural ECG test for checking epidural catheter placement
Br. J. Anaesth., December 1, 2005; 95(6): 837 - 837.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Canadian J. AnesthesiaHome page
B. C.H. Tsui
New tool for checking epidural catheter location
Can J Anesth, October 1, 2005; 52(8): 890 - 890.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Canadian J. AnesthesiaHome page
S. A. Lang, C. Prusinkiewicz, and B. C.H. Tsui
Failed spinal anesthesia after a psoas compartment block: [L'echec de la rachianesthesie apres le bloc de la loge du psoas]
Can J Anesth, January 1, 2005; 52(1): 74 - 78.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Anesth. Analg.Home page
B. C. H. Tsui, A. Wagner, D. Cave, and R. Seal
Threshold Current for an Insulated Epidural Needle in Pediatric Patients
Anesth. Analg., September 1, 2004; 99(3): 694 - 696.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Canadian J. AnesthesiaHome page
B. C.H. Tsui, A. Wagner, and B. Finucane
The threshold current in the intrathecal space to elicit motor response is lower and does not overlap that in the epidural space: a porcine model: [Le courant seuil qui produit une reponse motrice est plus faible dans l'espace intrathecal que dans l'espace peridural et ne le chevauche pas: un modele porcin]
Can J Anesth, August 1, 2004; 51(7): 690 - 695.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Anesth. Analg.Home page
B. C. H. Tsui, S. Malherbe, J. Koller, and K. Aronyk
Reversal of an Unintentional Spinal Anesthetic by Cerebrospinal Lavage
Anesth. Analg., February 1, 2004; 98(2): 434 - 436.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Anesth. Analg.Home page
S. M. Goobie, C. J. Montgomery, R. Basu, J. McFadzean, G. J. O'Connor, K. Poskitt, and B. C. H. Tsui
Confirmation of Direct Epidural Catheter Placement Using Nerve Stimulation in Pediatric Anesthesia
Anesth. Analg., October 1, 2003; 97(4): 984 - 988.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Anesth. Analg.Home page
S. A. Lang, B. Tsui, T. Grau, T. Kasai, K. Yaegashi, H. Hirose, and Y. Tanaka
New Avenues of Epidural Research * Response
Anesth. Analg., July 1, 2003; 97(1): 292 - 293.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Anesth. Analg.Home page
B. C.H. Tsui, B. Finucane, and K. Hayatsu
Verifying Accurate Placement of an Epidural Catheter Tip Using Electrical Stimulation * Response
Anesth. Analg., June 1, 2002; 94(6): 1670 - 1671.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Anesth. Analg.Home page
B. C. H. Tsui, R. Seal, J. Koller, L. Entwistle, R. Haugen, and R. Kearney
Thoracic Epidural Analgesia Via the Caudal Approach in Pediatric Patients Undergoing Fundoplication Using Nerve Stimulation Guidance
Anesth. Analg., November 1, 2001; 93(5): 1152 - 1155.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1999 by the Canadian Anesthesiologists' Society.