CJA
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a scholarly reply
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Siddik-Sayyid, S.
Right arrow Articles by Baraka, A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Siddik-Sayyid, S.
Right arrow Articles by Baraka, A.

Canadian Journal of Anesthesia, Vol 46, 731-735, Copyright © 1999 by Canadian Anesthesiologists' Society


ARTICLES

Epidural tramadol for postoperative pain after Cesarean section

S Siddik-Sayyid, M Aouad-Maroun, D Sleiman, M Sfeir and A Baraka
Department of Anesthesiology, American University of Beirut, Lebanon.

PURPOSE: To compare the post-operative analgesic effect of 100 mg vs 200 mg epidural tramadol and saline in patients undergoing elective Cesarean section. METHODS: Sixty healthy women undergoing Cesarean delivery with epidural anesthesia were randomly allocated into three groups (n = 20 in each). Patients received, at skin closure via the epidural catheter, 100 mg tramadol (Group I), 200 mg tramadol (Group II) or 10 ml saline (Control group). Pain scores and side effects were evaluated at 1, 2, 4, 8, 12 and 24 hr after surgery. Mean times to the first analgesic administration, as well as the cumulative doses of analgesic requirements over 24 hr postoperatively were compared. RESULTS: The mean time to first analgesic administration was longer in patients who received 100 mg tramadol (4.5 +/- 3.1 hr) and the 200 mg tramadol (6.6 +/- 3.4 hr) than in those who received placebo (2.8 +/- 2 hr). The mean cumulative doses of meperidine over 24 hr were less in the 100 mg tramadol group (0.3 +/- 0.3 mg x kg(-1)) and the 200 mg tramadol group (0.3 +/- 0.3 mg x kg(-1)) than in the control group (0.7 +/- 0.4 mg x kg(-1)). Also, the mean doses of diclofenac over 24 hr were less in the 100 mg tramadol group (156 +/- 59 mg) and the 200 mg tramadol group (142 +/- 62 mg) than in the control group (214 +/- 70 mg). However, no difference was obtained between patients receiving 100 mg and 200 mg tramadol concerning all parameters studied. CONCLUSION: Epidural tramadol 100 mg can provide adequate postoperative analgesia without respiratory depression in patients after Cesarean delivery.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Br J AnaesthHome page
Y. Demiraran, B. Kocaman, and R. Y. Akman
A comparison of the postoperative analgesic efficacy of single-dose epidural tramadol versus morphine in children
Br. J. Anaesth., October 1, 2005; 95(4): 510 - 513.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Anesth. Analg.Home page
S. Robaux, C. Blunt, E. Viel, P. Cuvillon, P. Nouguier, G. Dautel, S. Boileau, F. Girard, and H. Bouaziz
Tramadol Added to 1.5% Mepivacaine for Axillary Brachial Plexus Block Improves Postoperative Analgesia Dose-Dependently
Anesth. Analg., April 1, 2004; 98(4): 1172 - 1177.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Br J AnaesthHome page
J. A. Alhashemi and A. M. Kaki
Effect of intrathecal tramadol administration on postoperative pain after transurethral resection of prostate
Br. J. Anaesth., October 1, 2003; 91(4): 536 - 540.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Canadian J. AnesthesiaHome page
E. Gurses, H. Sungurtekin, E. Tomatir, C. Balci, and M. Gonullu
The addition of droperidol or clonidine to epidural tramadol shortens onset time and increases duration of postoperative analgesia: [L'addition de droperidol ou de clonidine a l'administration peridurale de tramadol raccourcit le delai d'installation et prolonge la duree de l'analgesie postoperatoire]
Can J Anesth, February 1, 2003; 50(2): 147 - 152.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1999 by the Canadian Anesthesiologists' Society.