Canadian Journal of Anesthesia, Vol 46, 827-831, Copyright © 1999 by Canadian Anesthesiologists' Society

ARTICLES

Intraoperative detection of segmental wall motion abnormalities with transesophageal echocardiography

P Couture, AY Denault, S Carignan, D Boudreault, D Babin and M Ruel
Department of Anesthesia, Montreal Heart Institute, Quebec, Canada. pcouture@sympatico.ca

PURPOSE: To compare two methods of analysis of regional wall-motion (RWM) using transesophageal echocardiography (TEE). METHODS: Thirty patients undergoing coronary artery bypass surgery were studied. The transgastric short axis view at the mid-papillary level was recorded before and after cardiopulmonary bypass. All images were reviewed by an anesthesiologist trained in TEE and an echocardiographer. Regional wall motion was graded: 1 normal, 2 hypokinetic, 3 akinetic, and 4 dyskinetic. The left ventricle was evaluated according to the guidelines of the American Society of Echocardiography using 6-segment, and 4-segment models. Agreement between observers (interobservers), and for one observer at two different moments (intraobservers), for grading each segment was defined as RWM abnormality scores within 1 grade. A wall-motion score index (WMSI), which is the sum of individual scores divided by the number of segments visualized, was calculated. A Bland Altman analysis was used to assess interobserver variability. RESULTS: Agreement between observers occurred in 96% and 94% of the examined segments, using 4- and 6-segment models respectively. Intraobserver agreement was 99% and 97% for the 4- and 6-segment models. The mean differences (bias) of the interobserver variability in grading the segments were 0.04 +/- 0.79 and 0 +/- 0.72 using a 4- or 6-segment model. The mean difference of the interobserver variability in WMSI were -0.05 +/- 0.42 and 0.05 +/- 0.37 using a 4- or a 6-segment model. CONCLUSION: Both methods, using either a 4- or a 6-segment model, result in a high intraobserver and interobserver agreement, and a low interobserver variability.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				P. Couture, A. Y. Denault, M. Pellerin, and J.-C. Tardif Milrinone enhances systolic, but not diastolic function during coronary artery bypass grafting surgery: [La milrinone ameliore la fonction systolique mais non la fonction diastolique pendant la chirurgie de pontage aortocoronarien] Can J Anesth, July 1, 2007; 54(7): 509 - 522. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. Hache, A. Denault, S. Belisle, D. Robitaille, P. Couture, P. Sheridan, M. Pellerin, D. Babin, N. Noel, M.-C. Guertin, et al. Inhaled epoprostenol (prostacyclin) and pulmonary hypertension before cardiac surgery J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., March 1, 2003; 125(3): 642 - 649. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				P. Zimmermann, C. Greim, H. Trautner, U. Sagmeister, K. Kraemer, and N. Roewer Echocardiographic Monitoring During Induction of General Anesthesia with a Miniaturized Esophageal Probe Anesth. Analg., January 1, 2003; 96(1): 21 - 27. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				R. Lattik, P. Couture, A. Y. Denault, M. Carrier, F. Harel, J. Taillefer, and J.-C. Tardif Mitral Doppler Indices Are Superior to Two-Dimensional Echocardiographic and Hemodynamic Variables in Predicting Responsiveness of Cardiac Output to a Rapid Intravenous Infusion of Colloid Anesth. Analg., May 1, 2002; 94(5): 1092 - 1099. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				A. Y. Denault, P. Couture, S. McKenty, D. Boudreault, F. Plante, R. Perron, D. Babin, and J. Buithieu Perioperative use of transesophageal echocardiography by anesthesiologists: impact in noncardiac surgery and in the intensive care unit : [L'utilisation perioperatoire de l'echocardiographie transoesophagienne par les anesthesiologistes : les repercussions en chirurgie non cardiaque et a l'unite des soins intensifs] Can J Anesth, March 1, 2002; 49(3): 287 - 293. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				F. Bernard, A. Denault, D. Babin, C. Goyer, P. Couture, A. Couturier, and J. Buithieu Diastolic Dysfunction is Predictive of Difficult Weaning from Cardiopulmonary Bypass Anesth. Analg., February 1, 2001; 92(2): 291 - 298. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				T. Shiga, R. Ogawa, and J. Shanewise Five-grade Scoring System Is Still Confusing: Does ASE/SCA Set Up a Double Standard? Response Anesth. Analg., May 1, 2000; 90(5): 1248 - 1249. [Full Text] [PDF]