CJA
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a scholarly reply
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Loewen, P. S.
Right arrow Articles by Zed, P. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Loewen, P. S.
Right arrow Articles by Zed, P. J.
Related Collections
Right arrow General Anesthesia

Canadian Journal of Anesthesia, Vol 47, 1008-1018, Copyright © 2000 by Canadian Anesthesiologists' Society


ARTICLES

5-HT3 receptor antagonists vs traditional agents for the prophylaxis of postoperative nausea and vomiting

PS Loewen, CA Marra and PJ Zed
Clinical Service Unit Pharmaceutical Sciences, Vancouver Hospital and Health Sciences Centre and Faculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of British Columbia, Canada.

PURPOSE: Numerous antiemetics have been studied for the prevention of postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) including traditional agents (metoclopramide, perphenazine, prochlorperazine, cyclizine and droperidol) and the 5-HT3 receptor antagonists (ondansetron, dolasetron, granisetron and tropisetron). The results have been divergent and inconsistent. The purpose of this quantitative systematic review was to evaluate the effectiveness of 5HT3 receptor antagonists compared to traditional antiemetics for the prevention of PONV METHODS: A systematic search of the English language literature using computerized MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Pre-MEDLINE databases from 1966 to October 1999 and a manual search of references from retrieved articles were performed. Individual efficacy and adverse effect data was extracted from each of the studies according to a predefined protocol. The summary odds ratios were calculated using the Dersimonian and Laird method under a random effects model. RESULTS: A total of 41 trials met our pre-defined inclusion criteria and were included in our analysis. Results in the 32 studies examining PONV indicated a 46% reduction in the odds of PONV in the 5-HT3-treated group (0.54 [95% CI 0.42-0.71], P < 0.001). Evaluation of PONV by traditional antiemetic agent demonstrated a 39% reduction compared with droperidol (0.61 [95% CI 0.42-0.89], P < 0.001) and a 56% reduction compared with metoclopramide (0.44 [95% CI 0.31-0.62], P < 0.001). Results in the 34 studies examining vomiting indicated a 38% reduction in the odds of vomiting in the 5-HT3-treated group (0.62 [95% CI 0.48-0.81], P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: The 5-HT3 receptor antagonists are superior to traditional antiemetic agents for the prevention of PONV and vomiting. The reduction in the odds of PONV and vomiting is significant in the overall analysis and the subgroup analyses comparing 5-HT3 receptor antagonists with droperidol and metoclopramide.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
The Annals of PharmacotherapyHome page
J. B Leslie and T. J Gan
Meta-Analysis of the Safety of 5-HT3 Antagonists with Dexamethasone or Droperidol for Prevention of PONV
Ann. Pharmacother., May 1, 2006; 40(5): 856 - 872.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am J Health Syst PharmHome page
J. Golembiewski, E. Chernin, and T. Chopra
Prevention and treatment of postoperative nausea and vomiting
Am. J. Health Syst. Pharm., June 15, 2005; 62(12): 1247 - 1260.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JAMAHome page
E. von Elm, G. Poglia, B. Walder, and M. R. Tramer
Different Patterns of Duplicate Publication: An Analysis of Articles Used in Systematic Reviews
JAMA, February 25, 2004; 291(8): 974 - 980.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Anesth. Analg.Home page
X. Chen, J. Tang, P. F. White, R. H. Wender, R. Quon, A. Sloninsky, R. Naruse, R. Kariger, T. Webb, and E. Norel
The Effect of Timing of Dolasetron Administration on its Efficacy as a Prophylactic Antiemetic in the Ambulatory Setting
Anesth. Analg., October 1, 2001; 93(4): 906 - 911.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2000 by the Canadian Anesthesiologists' Society.