CJA
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a scholarly reply
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Morgan, P. J.
Right arrow Articles by Lam-McCulloch, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Morgan, P. J.
Right arrow Articles by Lam-McCulloch, J.
Related Collections
Right arrow Obstetrical and Pediatric Anesthesia

Canadian Journal of Anesthesia, Vol 47, 956-961, Copyright © 2000 by Canadian Anesthesiologists' Society

ARTICLES

Comparison of maternal satisfaction between epidural and spinal anesthesia for elective Cesarean section

PJ Morgan, S Halpern and J Lam-McCulloch
Department of Anesthesia, Mount Sinai Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada. pam.morgan@utoronto.ca

PURPOSE: Epidural anesthesia was a commonly used technique for elective Cesarean section. Recently, because of the availability of non-cutting spinal needles, many institutions have changed from epidural to spinal anesthesia. The purpose of this study was to compare maternal satisfaction between epidural and spinal anesthesia for elective Cesarean section with a new satisfaction tool. METHODS: We studied healthy parturients in a randomized, double-blinded pilot study in which patients were assigned to receive either epidural (n = 13) or spinal (n = 14) anesthesia for elective Cesarean section. Two and 24 hr postoperatively, patients completed a validated 22-point maternal satisfaction questionnaire and a 10-cm visual analog score (VAS) for satisfaction. Maternal satisfaction scores were compared between groups. RESULTS: There was no difference in demographics, complications or technical failures between groups. Mean satisfaction scores on the questionnaire (0-154) at two and 24 hr were 130.23 +/- 11.36 and 129.54 +/- 16.70 for the epidural group and 116.92 +/- 18.47 and 115.92 +/- 15.71 for the spinal group (P = 0.04 and P = 0.03 respectively). No difference in VAS scores was noted. The presence of minor side effects including pruritus contributed to the lower satisfaction in the spinal group at 24 hr. CONCLUSION: This pilot study demonstrated higher maternal satisfaction with epidural than with spinal anesthesia for elective Cesarean section. This may be related to the increased side effects caused by neuraxial morphine. The satisfaction questionnaire was able to elucidate differences not detected with a global VAS for satisfaction. Further study with a larger patient population is required to confirm these data.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Anesth. Analg.Home page
S. S. Liu and C. L. Wu
The Effect of Analgesic Technique on Postoperative Patient-Reported Outcomes Including Analgesia: A Systematic Review
Anesth. Analg., September 1, 2007; 105(3): 789 - 808.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2000 by the Canadian Anesthesiologists' Society.