CJA
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a scholarly reply
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Byhahn, C.
Right arrow Articles by Westphal, K.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Byhahn, C.
Right arrow Articles by Westphal, K.
Related Collections
Right arrow General Anesthesia

Canadian Journal of Anesthesia, Vol 47, 984-988, Copyright © 2000 by Canadian Anesthesiologists' Society

ARTICLES

Occupational exposure to nitrous oxide and desflurane during ear-nose-throat-surgery

C Byhahn, HJ Wilke, U Strouhal, P Kessler, V Lischke and K Westphal
Department of Anesthesiology, Intensive Care Medicine, and Pain Control, J.W. Goethe-University Hospital Center, Frankfurt, Germany. c.byhahn@em.uni-frankfurt.de

PURPOSE: To determine occupational exposure of the anesthesiologist and surgeon to nitrous oxide and desflurane during general anesthesia for ear-nose-throat (ENT) surgery in children and adults. METHODS: An observational clinical trial was performed in ten children (C) and ten adults (A). Tracheas were intubated, in adults, with cuffed tubes and in children with uncuffed tubes. The operating room was equipped with modern air conditioning and waste anesthetic gas scavengers. Gas samples were obtained during the operative procedure every 90 sec from the breathing zone of subjects. Time-weighted averages (TWA) over the time of exposure were calculated for nitrous oxide and desflurane. RESULTS: Nitrous oxide TWAs for anesthesiologists were 0.41 +/- 0.23 ppm (A) and 1.20 +/- 0.32 ppm (C, P < 0.0001), and 2.24 +/- 1.93 ppm (A) and 5.30 +/- 0.60 ppm (C, P = 0.0001) for the surgeon who worked close to the patient's airway and thus had higher exposure (P < 0.05 [A], P < 0.0001 [C]). With regard to desflurane, the anesthesiologists' TWAs were 0.02 +/- 0.03 ppm for both adults and children. The surgeon was exposed to 0.21 +/- 0.24 ppm desflurane (A) and 0.30 +/- 0.14 ppm (C, P: n.s.). Although the surgeon's exposure was greater (P < 0.05 [A], P < 0.0001 [C]), the threshold limits of 25 ppm for nitrous oxide and 2 ppm for desflurane recommended by the National Institute of Occupational Safety and Health were not exceeded. CONCLUSIONS: Under modern air conditioning, occupational exposure to inhalational anesthetics is low, and inhalational anesthesia is safe from the standpoint of modern workplace laws and health-care regulations.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Canadian J. AnesthesiaHome page
J. Rieder, P. Lirk, G. Summer, A. Gunkel, U. Riccabona, P. Innerhofer, and A. Amann
Exposure to sevoflurane in otorhinolaryngologic operations
Can J Anesth, October 1, 2001; 48(9): 934 - 934.
[Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Br J AnaesthHome page
K. Taga, M. Tomita, I. Watanabe, K. Sato, K. Awamori, H. Fujihara, and K. Shimoji
Complete recovery of consciousness in a patient with decorticate rigidity following cardiac arrest after thoracic epidural injection
Br. J. Anaesth., October 1, 2000; 85(4): 632 - 634.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2000 by the Canadian Anesthesiologists' Society.