CJA
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
This Article
Right arrow Résumé de cet Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a scholarly reply
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Jackson, A.
Right arrow Articles by Milne, B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Jackson, A.
Right arrow Articles by Milne, B.
Related Collections
Right arrow Obstetrical and Pediatric Anesthesia

Canadian Journal of Anesthesia, Vol 47, 1068-1073, Copyright © 2000 by Canadian Anesthesiologists' Society

ARTICLES

Informed consent for labour epidurals: what labouring women want to know

A Jackson, R Henry, N Avery, E VanDenKerkhof and B Milne
Department of Anesthesiology, Queen's University, Kingston General Hospital, Ontario, Canada. aarondjackson@hotmail.com

PURPOSE: To determine A) what a labouring woman expects to hear about epidural analgesia before consenting, B) if she feels able to understand the risks and thereby assess if we are obtaining informed consent. METHODS: Sixty actively labouring women were surveyed immediately after requesting an epidural. Demographic, labour, epidural and consent information were included in the questionnaire. Answers were categorical (yes/no, multiple choice) or scored on a scale from 0 to 10 (visual analogue scale). RESULTS: The majority of parturients wanted all potential epidural complications but not their incidences disclosed in the consent process. However, a discussion of risks would not dissuade women from consenting to an epidural in the majority of cases. Labouring women have a moderate understanding of epidural risks. The ability to understand risks was not affected by labour pain, anxiety, opioid premedication, duration of labour pain, desire for an epidural, previous epidural experience, level of education or age. CONCLUSION: This prospective survey characterizes what 60 reasonable labouring women wanted to know about labour epidural analgesia. Parturients wanted all risks of epidural analgesia disclosed in the informed consent process. The majority of women did not want the incidences quoted. This study suggests that labouring patients are as able to give informed consent as are other members of our patient population.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 J. Med. EthicsHome page
H El-Wakeel, G J Taylor, and J J T Tate
What do patients really want to know in an informed consent procedure? A questionnaire-based survey of patients in the Bath area, UK.
J. Med. Ethics, October 1, 2006; 32(10): 612 - 616.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Canadian J. AnesthesiaHome page
K. Smedstad and W Beilby
Informed consent for epidural analgesia in labour
Can J Anesth, November 1, 2000; 47(11): 1055 - 1059.



HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2000 by the Canadian Anesthesiologists' Society.