CJA
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a scholarly reply
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Mamie, C.
Right arrow Articles by Forster, A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Mamie, C.
Right arrow Articles by Forster, A.
Related Collections
Right arrow General Anesthesia

Canadian Journal of Anesthesia, Vol 47, 1166-1170, Copyright © 2000 by Canadian Anesthesiologists' Society

ARTICLES

Treatment efficacy is not an index of pain intensity

C Mamie, A Morabia, M Bernstein, CE Klopfenstein and A Forster
Division of Anesthesiology, University Hospital, Geneva, Switzerland. Chantal.Mamie@hcug.ch

PURPOSE: To determine if the efficacy of pain treatment assessed by the patient is a valid indicator to evaluate pain management. METHODS: Three hundred and ninety one adult patients were investigated on the day of surgery and on the two following days after intraperitoneal or orthopedic surgery. Pain scores and efficacy of pain treatment were evaluated using ungraduated visual analog scales (VAS). According to the evolution of pain between two consecutive days, patients were classified as having "worse pain", "same pain" or "lower pain". RESULTS: During the first time interval, pain treatment was considered effective by 42% of patients with worse pain, compared with 55% with less pain (OR= 1.9, 95% CI=1.1-3.7) and to 58% of patients with the same pain (OR =2.0, 95%CI=1.2-3.0). During the second time interval, these proportions were: 46% (worse pain), 63% (lower pain vs worse: OR= 1.8, 95%CI= 1.0-3.2) and 66% (same pain vs worse: OR=2.1, 95%CI=1.1-4.1). Using pain evolution as a"gold standard", patient assessment of pain treatment efficacy had sensitivity of 0.55 and specificity 0.5 during the first time interval, and of 0.63 and 0.43 during the second time interval. CONCLUSION: Patient evaluation of the efficacy of pain treatment can mislead the clinician about the severity of pain. Patients tend to be satisfied with pain treatment, even when pain is not relieved. The relation of intensity of pain to patient perception of treatment efficacy is weak.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Anesth. Analg.Home page
A. R. Webb, S. Leong, P. S. Myles, and S. J. Burn
The Addition of a Tramadol Infusion to Morphine Patient-Controlled Analgesia After Abdominal Surgery: A Double-Blinded, Placebo-Controlled Randomized Trial
Anesth. Analg., December 1, 2002; 95(6): 1713 - 1718.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Canadian J. AnesthesiaHome page
D. Buckley
Patient assessment of efficacy of pain management: the fallacy of management by opinion poll
Can J Anesth, December 1, 2000; 47(12): 1161 - 1165.



HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2000 by the Canadian Anesthesiologists' Society.