CJA
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

This Article
Right arrow Résumé de cet Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a scholarly reply
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Khaw, K.S.
Right arrow Articles by Critchley, L.A.H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Khaw, K.S.
Right arrow Articles by Critchley, L.A.H.
Related Collections
Right arrow Obstetrical and Pediatric Anesthesia
Canadian Journal of Anesthesia 47:155-159 (2000)
© Canadian Anesthesiologists' Society, 2000

Clinical Report

Epidural meperidine does not cause hemodynamic changes in the term parturient

K.S. Khaw , MBBS FRCA, W. D. Ngan Kee, MD FANZCA and L.A.H. Critchley, MD FFARCSI

From the Department of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care, Chinese University of Hong Kong, Prince of Wales Hospital, Shatin, Hong Kong, Peoples Republic of China.

Dr K.S. Khaw. Phone: +852-2632-2735; Fax: +852-2637-2422; E-mail: kimkhaw{at}cuhk.edu.hk

Purpose: Meperidine has local anesthetic properties and, therefore, when given epidurally it has the potential to cause hemodynamic changes. Our objective was to study the hemodynamic effects of an analgesic dose of epidural meperidine (50 mg) in 34 ASA 1-2 term parturients scheduled for elective Cesarean section under epidural anesthesia.

Methods: A lumbar epidural catheter was inserted and patients lay in the supine left wedge position. Intravenous fluid preload was withheld, and hemodynamic measurements comprising of mean arterial pressure, cardiac output and heart rate were made using automatic oscillotonometry (Dinamap 1486SX) and transthoracic electrical bioimpedance (Bomed NCCOM3). Following baseline measurements, the hemodynamic effects of sequential epidural injection of first, 10 ml saline, and 20 min thereafter, 50 mg meperidine diluted to 10 ml with saline, were recorded. Sensory blockade was assessed following each injection using loss of temperature discrimination to ice. Paired Student t tests were used to compare changes in hemodynamic variables.

Results: Epidural meperidine produced a small increase from the saline values in the mean (SD) cardiac output of 5.81 ±1.44 to 6.04 ± 1.54 Lmin–1 (P < 0.05), and mean arterial pressure of 77.1 ± 8.8 to 79.3 ± 9.9 mmHg (P < 0.05). Sensory changes, the upper level of which ranged from L1 to T1, were detected in 94% of patients given epidural meperidine. Epidural saline injection had no such hemodynamic effects, but produced a detectable sensory level in two patients.

Conclusion: Epidural meperidine, 50 mg, caused minimal hemodynamic changes in term parturients.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Br J AnaesthHome page
C. Connolly, D. M. Coventry, and J. A. W. Wildsmith
Double-blind comparison of ropivacaine 7.5 mg ml-1 with bupivacaine 5 mg ml-1 for sciatic nerve block
Br. J. Anaesth., May 1, 2001; 86(5): 674 - 677.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2000 by the Canadian Anesthesiologists' Society.