CJA
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

This Article
Right arrow Résumé de cet Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a scholarly reply
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Leoni, A.
Right arrow Articles by Casati, A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Leoni, A.
Right arrow Articles by Casati, A.
Related Collections
Right arrow Regional Anesthesia and Pain
Canadian Journal of Anesthesia 47:185-187 (2000)
© Canadian Anesthesiologists' Society, 2000

Brief Report

Cervical plexus anesthesia for carotid endarterectomy: comparison of ropivacaine and mepivacaine

Albino Leoni, MD , Silvio Magrin, MD, Giuseppe Mascotto, MD, Andrea Rigamonti, MD, Giorgio Gallioli, MD, Fausto Muzzolon, MD, Guido Fanelli, MD and Andrea Casati, MD

From the Department of Anaesthesiology, University of Milan, Milan, Italy.

Dr. A. Casati, Department of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care, IRCCS H San Raffaele, Via Olgettina 60, 20132 Milan, Italy. Phone: +39-2-26432656; Fax: +39-2-26412823; E-mail: casati.andrea{at}hsr.it

Purpose: To evaluate the effectiveness of cervical plexus block performed with ropivacaine 0.75% or 1%, or mepivacaine 2%.

Methods: In a prospective, randomized, double-blind study, 60 patients received deep cervical plexus block with 0.2 mlkg–1 divided among C2-C4 injections using ropivacaine 0.75% and 1% or mepivacaine 2%. A blinded observer recorded loss of pin-prick sensation every minute in the C2-C4 dermatomes until readiness for surgery. Then, a superficial cervical block was performed with 0.15 mlkg–1 lidocaine 1%. The need for intraoperative supplemental analgesia and degree of pain and time of first postoperative pain medication were also recorded.

Results: General anesthesia was not required to complete surgery in any case. No differences in the need for intraoperative supplemental analgesia was observed (7, 6, and 9 patients with ropivacaine 0.75% and 1% or mepivacaine 2%, respectively). Readiness to surgery required 15 (10 - 25) min with ropivacaine 0.75%, 18 (8 - 20) min with ropivacaine 1%, and 15 (5 - 20) min with mepivacaine 2% (P = NS); while patients asked for first postoperative pain medication after 10 (4 - 13) hr and 9 (6.5 - 11) hr with ropivacaine 0.75% and 1% compared with 5 (0 - 8) hr with mepivacaine 2% (P < 0.05).

Conclusion: Ropivacaine 0.75% or 1% are appropriate choices when performing cervical plexus anesthesia for carotid endarterectomy, providing nerve block characteristics similar to those of mepivacaine 2%, but with the advantage of longer postoperative pain relief.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Br J AnaesthHome page
J. J. Pandit, R. Satya-Krishna, and P. Gration
Superficial or deep cervical plexus block for carotid endarterectomy: a systematic review of complications
Br. J. Anaesth., August 1, 2007; 99(2): 159 - 169.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Anesth. Analg.Home page
S. Aunac, M. Carlier, F. Singelyn, and M. De Kock
The Analgesic Efficacy of Bilateral Combined Superficial and Deep Cervical Plexus Block Administered Before Thyroid Surgery Under General Anesthesia
Anesth. Analg., September 1, 2002; 95(3): 746 - 750.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2000 by the Canadian Anesthesiologists' Society.