CJA
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

This Article
Right arrow Résumé de cet Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a scholarly reply
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Motamed, C.
Right arrow Articles by Donati, F.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Motamed, C.
Right arrow Articles by Donati, F.
Related Collections
Right arrow General Anesthesia
Canadian Journal of Anesthesia 47:225-231 (2000)
© Canadian Anesthesiologists' Society, 2000

Reports of Investigation

Intubating conditions and blockade after mivacurium, rocuronium and their combination in young and elderly adults

C. Motamed, MD and F. Donati, PhD MD FRCPC

From the Department of Anaesthesia, Hôtel-Dieu, Centre Hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal, Montréal, Québec, Canada.

Address correspondence to: François Donati PhD MD FRCPC, Département d'anesthésie, Centre Hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal, Hôtel- Dieu, 3840, rue Saint Urbain, Montréal, Québec, H2W 1T8 Canada. Phone: 514-843-2611 X 4636; Fax: 514-543-2690; E-mail: donatif{at}medclin.umontreal.ca

Purpose: Mivacurium-rocuronium combinations have been demonstrated to be more potent than either drug given alone. Combinations were compared with mivacurium and rocuronium, with respect to onset, intubating conditions, and duration of action in young and elderly adults.

Methods: Fentanyl-propofol-N2O-isoflurane anesthesia was given to ASA I and II adults aged 18-65 yr (45 patients) and over 66 yr (45 patients). In this blinded randomized study, we compared accelerographic adductor pollicis response and visual assessment of response to facial nerve stimulation after 0.25 mg•kg–1 mivacurium, 0.6 mg•kg–1 rocuronium, and a combination of 0.08 mg•kg–1 mivacurium plus 0.2 mg•kg–1 rocuronium. Intubating conditions at 2.5 min were rated as excellent, good, fair or poor.

Results: Onset times were similar for all drugs regimens and for both age groups (204-276 sec at the thumb; 142-196 sec at the eye) (P < 0.05 between muscles). Intubating conditions were similar in all groups, and rated good or excellent, except in two subjects. In young patients duration to 25% recovery was longer (P < 0.05) for rocuronium (mean ± SD) (39 ± 11 min) than for either mivacurium (23 ± 6 min), or the combination (27 ± 7 min). Duration was prolonged in the elderly for rocuronium (54 ± 17 min), and the combination ( 35 ± 11 min), but not for mivacurium (24 ± 6 min).

Conclusions: Mivacurium-rocuronium combinations yield onset times and intubating conditions similar to either parent agent with only two thirds as much total drug. Duration for such a mixture is similar to that of mivacurium in young adults and slightly prolonged in the elderly.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2000 by the Canadian Anesthesiologists' Society.