CJA
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

This Article
Right arrow Résumé de cet Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a scholarly reply
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Renehan, E. M.
Right arrow Articles by Chow, D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Renehan, E. M.
Right arrow Articles by Chow, D.
Related Collections
Right arrow Regional Anesthesia and Pain
Canadian Journal of Anesthesia 47:329-333 (2000)
© Canadian Anesthesiologists' Society, 2000

Clinical Report

Visualization of a looped and knotted epidural catheter with a guidewire

Elizabeth M. Renehan, MSc MD*, Rebecca A. Peterson, MD FRCPC{dagger}, John P. Penning, MD FRCPC*, Ola P. Rosaeg, MB FRCPC* and Donald Chow, MD FRCSC DIP SP MED{ddagger}

* From the Departments of Anesthesiology and
{dagger} Radiology, and the
{ddagger} Division of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Ottawa, Ottawa Hospital-Civic Campus, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.

Address correspondence to: Dr. E.M. Renehan, Department of Anesthesiology, Ottawa Hospital, Civic Campus, 1053 Carling Avenue, Ottawa, Ontario, K1Y 4E9 Canada. Phone: 613-761-4169; Fax: 613-761-5209; E-mail: Renehane{at}yahoo.com

Purpose: To describe the management of a looped and knotted epidural catheter after analgesia for labour and delivery.

Clinical Features: Obstetrical epidural pain relief was provided for a 37-yr old woman in early labour. A 20-gauge Portex® catheter was inserted at the L2 - L3 interspace. Six centimetres of catheter was left in the epidural space. After vaginal delivery the catheter could not be removed. The catheter was left in situ for 24 hr. Repeated attempts at removal were again unsuccessful. The epidural catheter was not visible with fluoroscopy and it was impossible to inject radiopaque dye into the catheter. However, we successfully advanced a 0.016 inch guidewire through the epidural catheter and radiologically demonstrated a knot and part of a loop. The catheter was removed by an orthopedic surgeon using blunt dissection under local anesthetic from the soft tissue just lateral to the interspinous ligament.

Conclusions: A knot can be a rare cause of a trapped epidural catheter. A suggested approach to the trapped lumbar epidural catheter: 1) Gentle traction on the catheter with the patient in various positions and in various degrees of lumbar flexion. 2) Test for catheter patency by injecting sterile, preservative-free, normal saline through the catheter. 3) Radiological imaging to determine if a knot is present and to determine its location, using radiopaque contrast for patent catheters or a guidewire for occluded catheters. 4) The approach to definitive management is based on the position of the knot. This can range from excision under local anesthetic to consultation with a surgical specialty for more invasive retrieval.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Obstet GynecolHome page
J. M. G. Crane
Pregnancy Outcome After Loop Electrosurgical Excision Procedure: A Systematic Review
Obstet. Gynecol., November 1, 2003; 102(5): 1058 - 1062.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2000 by the Canadian Anesthesiologists' Society.