This Article Résumé de cet Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Submit a scholarly reply Alert me when this article is cited Alert me when eLetters are posted Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by McKay, W. P.S. Articles by Yip, R. W. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by McKay, W. P.S. Articles by Yip, R. W. Related Collections General Anesthesia

Distribution of randomised controlled trials of drugs for post-operative nausea and vomiting

From the Department of Anaesthesia, University of Saskatchewan, Royal University Hospital, 103 Hospital Drive, Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, S7N 0W8 Canada.

Address correspondence to: Dr. W.P.S. McKay. Phone: 306-655-1183; Fax: 306-655-1279; E-mail: mckayw{at}sdh.sk.ca

Purpose: Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) guide therapeutic decisions. But which RCTs are done; which omitted; and which should be done? This study illustrates a method to explore these questions applied to drugs for post-operative nausea and vomiting (PONV).

Methods: Review articles listed 18 drugs for PONV. All RCTs of these drugs for PONV were sought. The first drug mentioned in an RCT was counted and tabulated against others in all the arms of the RCT (against itself in a dose-ranging RCT). Additional drugs mentioned in these RCTs were added to the study, for a total of 40 drugs.

Results: Drugs involved in the most RCTs were: ondansetron 131 RCTs; propofol 118; droperidol 74; metoclopramide 67; granisetron 52; scopolamine 22; tropisetron 16. Drugs involved in the fewest RCTs: two drugs with 2 RCTs; twelve drugs with one; three with none. Probability that this distribution occurred by chance: P < 0.00001; that the distribution of dose-ranging RCTs occurred by chance: P < 0.001. Regression of RCT numbers on cost: R = 0.86, P < 0.0001; on year of drug introduction: R = 0.14. Of 1600 possible comparisons of drugs for PONV, (including dose-ranging) 97.8% have never been published.

Conclusion: Although some antiemetic drugs for PONV have been studied in large numbers of RCTs, many have not been adequately evaluated. Finding relevant RCTs and tabulating their comparison arms is useful for directing future research, and is applicable to any symptom or disorder.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				M. Al-Rawwaf, E. Surtie, and W. P. McKay PILOT: RCT OF CHLORPROMAZINE FOR POSTOPERATIVE NAUSEA AND VOMITING Can J Anesth, June 1, 2005; 52(suppl_1): A66 - A66. [Full Text] [PDF]