CJA
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

This Article
Right arrow Résumé de cet Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a scholarly reply
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Lafreniere, G.
Right arrow Articles by Parlow, J. L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Lafreniere, G.
Right arrow Articles by Parlow, J. L.
Related Collections
Right arrow General Anesthesia
Canadian Journal of Anesthesia 47:441-448 (2000)
© Canadian Anesthesiologists' Society, 2000

Reports of Investigation

Autonomic circulatory and cerebrocortical responses during increasing depth of propofol sedation/hypnosis in humans

Gina Lafreniere, MSc{dagger}, Brian Milne, MD FRCPC*,{dagger}, Donald G. Brunet, MD FRCPC{ddagger}, Michael A. Adams, PhD{dagger} and Joel L. Parlow, MD FRCPC*,{dagger}

* From the Departments of Anesthesiology, Pharmacology,
{dagger} and Medicine,
{ddagger} Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario.

Address Correspondence to: Dr. Joel L. Parlow, Department of Anesthesiology, Kingston General Hospital, 76 Stuart Street, Kingston, Ontario, K7L 2V7 Canada. Phone: 613-548-7827; Fax: 613-548-1375; E-mail: parlowj{at}post.queensu.ca

Purpose: To describe the relative effects of graded central nervous system (CNS) depression, using increasing propofol infusion rates, on neurovegetative brainstem-mediated circulatory control mechanisms and higher cortical activity in healthy humans.

Methods: Propofol was administered using an infusion scheme designed to achieve three target blood concentrations in ten healthy volunteers. Blood propofol concentrations and sedation scores were determined at baseline, during the three propofol infusion levels, and 30 min into the recovery period. Electroencephalographic (EEG) power was measured in three frequency bands to quantify cortical activity, and autonomic heart rate control was quantified using spontaneous baroreflex assessment and power spectral analysis of pulse interval.

Results: Sedation scores closely paralleled propofol blood concentrations (0, 0.53 ± 0.34, 1.24 ± 0.21, 3.11 ± 0.80, and 0.96 ± 0.42 µg•mL–1 at baseline, three infusion levels and recovery respectively), and all subjects were unconscious at the deepest level. Indices of autonomic heart rate control were decreased only at the deepest levels of CNS depression, while EEG effects were apparent at all propofol infusion rates. These EEG effects were frequency specific, with power in the beta band being affected at light levels of sedation, and alpha and delta power altered at deeper levels.

Conclusions: The results of this study support a relative preservation of neurovegetative circulatory control mechanisms during the early stages of CNS depression using gradually increasing rates of infusion of propofol. Indices of circulatory control did not reliably reflect depth of sedation.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2000 by the Canadian Anesthesiologists' Society.