CJA
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

This Article
Right arrow Résumé de cet Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a scholarly reply
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Minkowitz, H. S.
Right arrow Articles by The Multicentre Investigator Group,
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Minkowitz, H. S.
Right arrow Articles by The Multicentre Investigator Group,
Related Collections
Right arrow General Anesthesia
Canadian Journal of Anesthesia 47:522-528 (2000)
© Canadian Anesthesiologists' Society, 2000

Reports of Investigation

Postoperative pain management in patients undergoing major surgery after remifentanil vs fentanyl anesthesia

Harold S. Minkowitz, MD and The Multicentre Investigator Group

Address correspondence to: Harold Minkowitz MD, Memorial Hospital; Memorial City, Department of Anesthesiology, 920 Frostwood, Houston, TX 77024 USA. Phone: 713-932-3438; Fax: 713-932-3664; E-mail: mink{at}houston.rr.com

Purpose: To determine if morphine sulphate was an effective transition analgesic in patients receiving a remifentanil-based anesthetic regimen.

Methods: Open-label remifentanil or fentanyl was administered to 210 randomized patients undergoing inpatient surgery. Isoflurane and nitrous oxide was administered to all patients. Thirty minutes before the end of surgery, patients receiving remifentanil were randomized to receive morphine 0.15 mg•kg–1 (R/M15 group) or 0.20 mg•kg–1 (R/M20 group). Following extubation and prior to patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) initiation, 2 mg boluses of morphine were administered for moderate/severe pain. Efficacy endpoints were total morphine used in the post anesthesia care unit (PACU) and 24 and 48 hr postoperatively; postoperative pain; time to first morphine bolus; time to first PCA administration; and time to recovery endpoints.

Results: Mean total morphine used in PACU was not different among groups (15.5 mg, 16.5 mg and 13.3 mg in R/M15, R/M20 and F groups, respectively). Mean total 24 hr morphine use (58.1 mg, 56.93 mg and 53.6 mg in R/M15, R/M20 and F groups) and mean total morphine used at 48 hr were not different (69.8 mg, 64.7 mg and 62.1 mg in R/M15, R/M20 and F/I groups). Groups were similar with respect to pain severity ratings at all postoperative times. Patients in the fentanyl arm experienced faster times to some recovery endpoints than patients receiving either remifentanil regimen.

Conclusion: Morphine sulphate regimens of 0.15 or 0.20 mg•kg–1 administered 30 min before the end of surgery are equally effective transition regimens for inpatient procedures.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Br J AnaesthHome page
J. R. Sneyd
Recent advances in intravenous anaesthesia
Br. J. Anaesth., November 1, 2004; 93(5): 725 - 736.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Br J AnaesthHome page
N. Derrode, F. Lebrun, J.-C. Levron, M. Chauvin, and B. Debaene
Influence of peroperative opioid on postoperative pain after major abdominal surgery: sufentanil TCI versus remifentanil TCI. A randomized, controlled study
Br. J. Anaesth., December 1, 2003; 91(6): 842 - 849.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Br J AnaesthHome page
H. R. Munoz, M. E. Guerrero, V. Brandes, and L. I. Cortinez
Effect of timing of morphine administration during remifentanil-based anaesthesia on early recovery from anaesthesia and postoperative pain
Br. J. Anaesth., June 1, 2002; 88(6): 814 - 818.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2000 by the Canadian Anesthesiologists' Society.