| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
From the Departments of Anesthesiology and ENT-Surgery,
* University Erlangen-Nuremberg, Germany.
Address correspondence to: Dr. T.M. Hemmerling, Postfach 1367, 66363 St. Ingbert, Germany. E-mail: thomashemmerling{at}hotmail.com
Purpose: To compare surface and intramuscular laryngeal electromyography (EMG) with adductor pollicis muscle EMG after 0.1 mg·kg1 cisatracurium.
Methods: This prospective study included ten patients undergoing surgery with risk of damage to the recurrent laryngeal nerve (RLN). The tracheas were intubated after fentanyl/propofol without the aid of muscle relaxation. A surface laryngeal electrode was attached to the tube and placed amidst the vocal cords; two straight needles were inserted endoscopically into the left lateral cricoarytenoid muscle. Single twitch stimulation of the left RLN (0.1 Hz) was performed transcutaneously; skin EMG of the left adductor pollicis muscle was performed at 0.1 Hz. After supramaximal stimulation for 10 min, 0.1 mg·kg1 cisatracurium was injected. Lag, onset time and peak effect were measured and compared.
Results: Good correlation (r = 0.9, 0.8, P < 0.005) and good comparability of the two methods of laryngeal EMG (mean difference and limits of agreement: 0 ± 28 sec for lag time, -2 ± 84 sec for onset time) was shown. The mean surface laryngeal lag and onset times were 67 ± 22 sec and 198 ± 72 sec, compared with the adductor pollicis muscle (98 ± 30 sec and 242 ± 59 sec) at P < 0.01. Peak effects at larynx (92 ± 9%) and adductor pollicis muscle (95 ± 3%) were similar.
Conclusion: Surface laryngeal EMG is comparable to intramuscular laryngeal EMG to determine degree and onset of the neuromuscular blockade. Increasing muscle relaxation does not cause the surface electrode to lose contact with the vocal cords and therefore underestimate onset time and peak effect.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
T. M. Hemmerling and N. Le Brief review: Neuromuscular monitoring: an update for the clinician: [Article de synthese court : Monitorage neuromusculaire : une mise a jour pour le clinicien] Can J Anesth, January 1, 2007; 54(1): 58 - 72. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. M. Hemmerling, G. Michaud, S. Deschamps, and G. Trager An External Monitoring Site at the Neck Cannot Be Used to Measure Neuromuscular Blockade of the Larynx Anesth. Analg., June 1, 2005; 100(6): 1718 - 1722. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. M. Hemmerling and F. Donati Neuromuscular blockade at the larynx, the diaphragm and the corrugator supercilii muscle: a review: [Blocage neuromusculaire du larynx, du diaphragme et du muscle sourcilier : une revue] Can J Anesth, October 1, 2003; 50(8): 779 - 794. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. M. Hemmerling, F. Donati, and K. Girling Video Imaging of the Larynx Needs Careful Evaluation Response Anesth. Analg., July 1, 2001; 93(1): 243 - 244. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. M. Hemmerling, J. Schmidt, C. Hanusa, T. Wolf, and K. E Jacobi The lumbar paravertebral region provides a novel site to assess neuromuscular block at the diaphragm Can J Anesth, April 1, 2001; 48(4): 356 - 360. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |