CJA
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

This Article
Right arrow Résumé de cet Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a scholarly reply
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Ebert, T. J.
Right arrow Articles by Barney, J. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Ebert, T. J.
Right arrow Articles by Barney, J. A.
Canadian Journal of Anesthesia 48:133-138 (2001)
© Canadian Anesthesiologists' Society, 2001

General Anesthesia

High concentrations of isoflurane do not block the sympathetic nervous system activation from desflurane

Thomas J. Ebert, MD PhD, Timothy S. Trotier, MD, Shahbaz R. Arain, MD, Toni D. Uhrich, MS and Jill A. Barney, MS

From the Department of Anesthesiology, Medical College of Wisconsin and VA Medical Center, Milwaukee, WI, USA.

Address correspondence to:Dr. Thomas J. Ebert, VAMC/112A, Department of Anesthesiology, 5000 W. National Avenue, Milwaukee, WI 53295, USA. Phone: 414-384-2000, ext. 42419; Fax: 414-384-2939; E-mail: tjebert{at}mcw.edu

Purpose: The volatile anesthetic desflurane has been associated with neurocirculatory responses that have been relatively refractory to adjuvant treatment. We have employed desflurane to evaluate the integrity of the sympathetic nerve recording after establishment of the anesthetized state with another anesthetic agent. This retrospective evaluation of data from volunteers determined if higher concentrations of isoflurane that were sufficient to block the neurocirculatory response to laryngeal and tracheal stimulation would abolish the neurocirculatory response to desflurane.

Methods: Data from eight, healthy, young volunteers met our criteria for inclusion. They had been anesthetized with propofol or thiopental and intubated after neuromuscular blockade. Each subject was monitored with radial artery blood pressure (BP), heart rate (HR)(ECG), and sympathetic microneurography. Isoflurane had been administered to achieve a steady state concentration of 1.5 MAC (minimum alveolar concentration) while oxygenation and carbon dioxide were monitored with pulse oximetry and infrared spectrometry, respectively. A deep level of anesthesia was confirmed when laryngoscopy and endotracheal tube movement failed to elicit a neurocirculatory response. A brief exposure to 11% desflurane in the inspired gas was then provided.

Results: The responses to desflurane included significant increases in HR, range 32-84 b/min, and BP, range 15-72 mm Hg (P < 0.05). Sympathetic nerve activity increased substantially in the three volunteers with functional nerve recordings.

Conclusion: In healthy volunteers receiving 1.5 MAC isoflurane, which was sufficient to block the neurocirculatory response to laryngoscopy and tracheal stimulation, there were striking increases in sympathetic outflow, HR and BP when 11% desflurane was substituted for isoflurane.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Anesth. Analg.Home page
C. Keyl, A. Schneider, J. Hobbhahn, and L. Bernardi
Sinusoidal Neck Suction for Evaluation of Baroreflex Sensitivity During Desflurane and Sevoflurane Anesthesia
Anesth. Analg., December 1, 2002; 95(6): 1629 - 1636.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2001 by the Canadian Anesthesiologists' Society.