| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
From the Department of Anesthesiology & Intensive Care, East Hospital/Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Gothenburg, Sweden.
Address correspondence to: Dr. Iréne Andersson, Department of Anesthesiology & Intensive Care, East Hospital, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, S-416 85 Gothenburg, Sweden. Phone: 46-31-3434000; Fax: 46-31-3434490; E-mail: irene_maria.andersson{at}sahlgrenska.se
Purpose: To determine whether salvaged autologous blood collected postoperatively contains complement split products (SC5b-9), and pro-inflammatory cytokines (IL-6 and IL-8) and whether there are any differences between blood collected during hip or knee surgery.
Methods: Fifty-eight consecutive patients undergoing hip or knee replacement surgery were studied. Thirty-eight had postoperative bleeding large enough to require infusion of salvaged blood. The salvaged blood was filtered during collection through a 200 µm filter and before infusion a 40 µm filter was used. Samples for complement and cytokine determinations were drawn from the circulation and from the collected blood.
Results: High concentrations of SC5b-9, IL-6, and IL-8 were found in salvaged blood. The concentrations were higher than in the circulation (P < 0.05). The circulating concentrations of IL-6 and IL-8 were increased 60 min and 12-18 hr after transfusion. There were no differences regarding SC5b-9, IL-6, and IL-8 in the blood collected after hip or knee surgery.
Conclusion: Blood collected from a surgical wound contains large concentrations of inflammatory mediators. There were no differences between blood collected during hip or knee surgery.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
R. S. Weber, N. Jabbour, and R. C. G. Martin II Anemia and Transfusions in Patients Undergoing Surgery for Cancer Ann. Surg. Oncol., January 1, 2008; 15(1): 34 - 45. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
N Nitescu, A Bengtsson, and J P Bengtson Blood salvage with a continuous autotransfusion system compared with a haemofiltration system Perfusion, September 1, 2002; 17(5): 357 - 362. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |