CJA
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

This Article
Right arrow Résumé de cet Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow An erratum has been published
Right arrow Submit a scholarly reply
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Greenberg, M.
Right arrow Articles by Hilfiker, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Greenberg, M.
Right arrow Articles by Hilfiker, M.
Canadian Journal of Anesthesia 48:478-482 (2001)
© Canadian Anesthesiologists' Society, 2001

Obstetrical and Pediatric Anesthesia

Separation of omphalopagus conjoined twins using combined caudal epidural - general anesthesia

Mark Greenberg, MD*, David D. Frankville, MD{dagger} and Mary Hilfiker, MD PhD{ddagger}

* From the Departments of Anesthesiology and
{dagger} Pediatric Surgery,
{ddagger} University of California at San Diego, California, USA.

Address correspondence to: Dr. Mark Greenberg, Department of Anesthesiology, University of California, San Diego, UCSD Medical Center, 200 West Arbor Drive, San Diego, CA 92103-8770, USA. Phone: 619-543-1999; Fax: 619-542-5424; E-mail: mgreenbe{at}ucsd.edu

Purpose: To describe the anesthetic management of newborn omphalopagus conjoined twins undergoing a series of diagnostic and surgical procedures which culminated in successful separation at one month of age.

Clinical features: Evaluations of the extent of shared organ systems were carried out without the need for anesthesia. The twins were anesthetized twice, once for insertion of skin expanders, and later for surgical separation. Various airway management techniques were utilized. To facilitate surgical separation, caudal epidural catheters were inserted in an effort to provide both operative and post-operative analgesia. In addition, prior to the induction of anesthesia, the extent of cross-circulation between twins was assessed.

Conclusion: Caudal epidural catheters can be used to provide both operative and post-operative analgesia. Early extubation, another benefit of regional analgesia, was not achieved because both twins developed respiratory failure in the immediate post-operative period. Testing for the extent of cross-circulation between twins proved valuable, allowing for detailed scripting of the complex induction sequence and airway management.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Anesth. Analg.Home page
C. Seefelder, D. R. Hill, R. C. Shamberger, and R. S. Holzman
Awake Caudal Anesthesia for Inguinal Surgery in One Conjoined Twin
Anesth. Analg., February 1, 2003; 96(2): 412 - 413.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2001 by the Canadian Anesthesiologists' Society.