CJA
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

This Article
Right arrow Résumé de cet Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a scholarly reply
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Piper, S. N.
Right arrow Articles by Boldt, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Piper, S. N.
Right arrow Articles by Boldt, J.
Canadian Journal of Anesthesia 48:742-747 (2001)
© Canadian Anesthesiologists' Society, 2001

General Anesthesia

Urapidil does not prevent postanesthetic shivering: a dose-ranging study

[L'urapidil n'empêche pas le frisson postanesthésique : une étude de dosage]

Swen N. Piper, MD, Moritz T. Fent, MD, Kerstin D. Röhm, MD, Wolfgang H. Maleck, Stefan W. Suttner, MD and Joachim Boldt, MD

From the Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Klinikum Ludwigshafen, Ludwigshafen, Germany.

Address correspondence to: Dr. Swen N. Piper, Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Klinikum Ludwigshafen, Bremserstraße 79 D-67063, Ludwigshafen, Germany. Phone: 0049-621-503-3000; Fax: 0049-621-503-3024; E-mail: wolfgang_maleck{at}hotmail.com

Purpose: To investigate the effect of 0.2 mg•kg–1, 0.3 mg•kg–1 and 0.4 mg•kg–1 urapidil on the incidence and severity of postanesthetic shivering.

Methods: One hundred and fifty patients (ASA I–III) scheduled for elective abdominal, urologic or orthopedic surgery under standardized general anesthesia were randomly allocated to one of five groups (each group n=30) using a double-blind protocol: group A received 0.2 mg•kg–1 urapidil, group B: 0.3 mg•kg–1 urapidil, group C: 0.4 mg•kg–1 urapidil, group D: 3 µg•kg–1 clonidine (positive control group), and group E: saline 0.9% as placebo (negative control group). Postanesthetic shivering was scored using a five-point scale.

Results: Twelve patients of group A, 11 of group B, nine of group C, three of group D and 14 of group E showed signs of postanesthetic shivering. Postanesthetic shivering was significantly decreased in the clonidine group compared to the three urapidil groups and the placebo group. Significantly less patients treated with clonidine needed anti-shivering therapy. There were no significant differences between the urapidil and placebo groups. Therapeutic interventions for hemodynamic effects were not required in any group. Time to extubation, but not time to discharge, was prolonged in the clonidine group.

Conclusion: Urapidil showed no beneficial effect on shivering in any of the doses evaluated, whereas prophylactic administration of clonidine was effective in preventing postanesthetic shivering.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Anesth. Analg.Home page
P. Kranke, L. H. Eberhart, N. Roewer, and M. R. Tramer
Single-Dose Parenteral Pharmacological Interventions for the Prevention of Postoperative Shivering: A Quantitative Systematic Review of Randomized Controlled Trials
Anesth. Analg., September 1, 2004; 99(3): 718 - 727.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Anesth. Analg.Home page
J.-D. Roy, M. Girard, and P. Drolet
Intrathecal Meperidine Decreases Shivering During Cesarean Delivery Under Spinal Anesthesia
Anesth. Analg., January 1, 2004; 98(1): 230 - 234.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2001 by the Canadian Anesthesiologists' Society.