CJA
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

This Article
Right arrow Résumé de cet Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a scholarly reply
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hudson, R. J.
Right arrow Articles by Peterson, D. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Hudson, R. J.
Right arrow Articles by Peterson, D. J.
Canadian Journal of Anesthesia 49:388-392 (2002)
© Canadian Anesthesiologists' Society, 2002

Cardiothoracic Anesthesia, Respiration and Airway

Validation of fentanyl pharmacokinetics in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting

[Validation de la pharmacocinétique du fentanyl utilisé pour un pontage aortocoronarien (PAC)]

Robert J. Hudson, MD FRCPC, Ian R. Thomson, MD FRCPC, Blair T. Henderson, MD, Karanbir Singh, MD, Gary Harding, MD and David J. Peterson, MD

From the Department of Anesthesia, University of Manitoba, St. Boniface General Hospital, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada.

Dr. Robert J. Hudson, Department of Anesthesia, St. Boniface General Hospital, 409 Tache Avenue, Winnipeg, Manitoba R2H 2A6, Canada. Phone: 204-235-3455; Fax: 204-231-0425; E-mail: rhudson{at}cc.umanitoba.ca

Purpose: The current emphasis on more rapid recovery and earlier tracheal extubation after cardiac surgery requires greater precision in administering opioids to reap their benefits while minimizing the duration of postoperative respiratory depression. Therefore, we aimed to define a pharmacokinetic model that accurately predicts fentanyl concentrations before, during, and after cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG).

Methods: Parameters for two-compartment and three-compartment models were estimated by applying population pharmacokinetic modelling to fentanyl concentration vs time data measured in 29 patients undergoing elective, primary CABG. The ability of these models to predict fentanyl concentrations in a second series of ten patients undergoing CABG was then assessed.

Results: A simple, three-compartment model had excellent predictive ability, with a median prediction error (PE = ([Fentanyl]meas - [Fentanyl]pred)/[Fentanyl]pred •100%) of -0.5%, and a median absolute PE (APE = |PE|) of 14.0%. In comparison to the two-compartment models, linear regression of measured:predicted concentration ratios indicated that the three-compartment model was free of systematic and time-related changes in bias (P < 0.05). The parameters of this three-compartment model are: V1 15.0 l, V2 20.0 l, V3 86.1 l, Cl1 1.08 L•min-1, Cl2 4.90 L•min-1, and Cl3 2.60 L•min-1.

Conclusions: Our pharmacokinetic model provides a rational foundation for designing fentanyl dose regimens for patients undergoing CABG. When combined with previously published information regarding intraoperative fentanyl pharmacodynamics, dose regimens that reliably achieve and maintain desired fentanyl concentrations throughout the intraoperative period can be designed to achieve specific therapeutic goals.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2002 by the Canadian Anesthesiologists' Society.