| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
From the Department of Anaesthesia, University School of Medicine Campus Bio-Medico, Rome, Italy.
Prof. F. Agrò, Department of Anaesthesia, University School of Medicine Campus Bio- Medico, Via E. Longoni 83 - 00155 Rome, Italy. Phone: +39-0622541522; Fax +39-0622541445; E-mail: f.agro{at}unicampus.it
Purpose: To verify if correct ProSeal laryngeal mask airway (PLMA) placement may condition blind insertion of a gastric tube via the PLMA.
Methods: The PLMA was studied in 150 anesthetized patients using a size #4 in (females) and #5 in (males). Its position was determined by inserting a fibrescope in the airway tube. A lubricated gastric tube was inserted through the PLMA drainage tube, recording the number of attempts at insertion. The relationship between fibreoptic glottic visualization score and attempts at gastric tube insertion using the PLMA was tested statistically.
Results: Insertion success rate of the PLMA and of the gastric tube was 93.3% and 99.3%, respectively. Ventilation was satisfactory in all patients, irrespective of fibreoptic score value. A significant correlation (Spearmans rank correlation, P = 0.0186) was present between attempts at gastric tube insertion and fibreoptic score.
Conclusion: Partial or total visualization of the vocal cords makes the success of gastric tube insertion more probable. Considering that fibreoptic visualization of the glottic aperture is associated with ease of insertion of a gastric tube (P < 0.02), the authors recommend adjusting or reinserting the PLMA if difficulty during the initial positioning of the gastric tube is experienced.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
T. M. Cook, G. Lee, and J. P. Nolan The ProSealTM laryngeal mask airway: a review of the literature: [Le masque larynge ProSealTM : un examen des publications] Can J Anesth, August 1, 2005; 52(7): 739 - 760. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. M. Cook and J. Cranshaw Randomized crossover comparison of ProSeal(R) Laryngeal Mask Airway with Laryngeal Tube Sonda(R) during anaesthesia with controlled ventilation Br. J. Anaesth., August 1, 2005; 95(2): 261 - 266. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. J. O'Connor Jr, M. S. Stix, and D. R. Valade Glottic insertion of the ProSealTM LMA occurs in 6% of cases: a review of 627 patients: [L'insertion glottique du ML ProSealTM survient dans 6 % des cas : une revue de 627 patients] Can J Anesth, February 1, 2005; 52(2): 199 - 204. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. Cook, E. Figueredo, and M. Martinez Comparing the ProSealTM Laryngeal Mask Airway with the Laryngeal Tube Airway * Response Anesth. Analg., October 1, 2003; 97(4): 1202 - 1203. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |