| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
From the Department of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care, Faculty of Medicine, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Prince of Wales Hospital, Hong Kong, PRC.
Address correspondence to: Dr. Anthony Ho, Department of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Prince of Wales Hospital, Shatin, NT, Hong Kong SAR, PRC. Phone: +852-2632-2735 Fax: +852-2637-2422 E-mail: hoamh{at}hotmail.com
Purpose: To report the use of a combined paravertebral lumbar plexus and parasacral sciatic nerve block for reduction of hip fracture in an elderly patient with severe aortic stenosis.
Clinical features: In an 87-yr-old lady with severe aortic stenosis and fracture of the right trochanter due to a fall, a combined right-sided paravertebral lumbar plexus and parasacral sciatic nerve block was used successfully for operative reduction of the fracture. A moderate amount of phenylephrine was required to maintain adequate systemic blood pressure despite the largely unilateral nature of the blocks.
Conclusion: Combined paravertebral lumbar plexus and parasacral sciatic nerve block can be a viable alternative to general anesthesia and epidural or spinal block for hip surgery in patients with severe aortic stenosis.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
M. K. Karmakar, A. M.-H. Ho, X. Li, W. H. Kwok, K. Tsang, and W. D. Ngan Kee Ultrasound-guided lumbar plexus block through the acoustic window of the lumbar ultrasound trident Br. J. Anaesth., April 1, 2008; 100(4): 533 - 537. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Mannion Epidural spread depends on the approach used for posterior lumbar plexus block Can J Anesth, May 1, 2004; 51(5): 516 - 517. [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
M. K. Karmakar and A. M.-H. Ho Reply: Can J Anesth, May 1, 2004; 51(5): 517 - 517. [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
E. Gaertner, P. Lascurain, C. Venet, X. Maschino, A. Zamfir, R. Lupescu, and A. Hadzic Continuous Parasacral Sciatic Block: A Radiographic Study Anesth. Analg., March 1, 2004; 98(3): 831 - 834. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |