CJA
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

This Article
Right arrow Résumé de cet Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a scholarly reply
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Joo, H. S.
Right arrow Articles by Mazer, C. D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Joo, H. S.
Right arrow Articles by Mazer, C. D.
Canadian Journal of Anesthesia 49:986-989 (2002)
© Canadian Anesthesiologists' Society, 2002

Cardiothoracic Anesthesia, Respiration and Airway

PVC tracheal tubes exert forces and pressures seven to ten times higher than silicone or armoured tracheal tubes - an in vitro study

[Les tubes trachéaux de PVC exercent des forces et des pressions de sept à dix fois plus élevées que les tubes en silicone ou les tubes armés - une étude in vitro]

Hwan S. Joo, MD FRCPC*, Mark T. Kataoka, MD FRCPC*, Robert J.B. Chen, MD FRCPC*, John Doyle, MD PhD FRCPC{dagger} and C. David Mazer, MD FRCPC*

* From the Departments of Anaesthesia, St. Michael’s Hospital and the University Health Network,
{dagger} University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.

Address correspondence to: Dr. Hwan Joo, Department of Anaesthesia, St. Michael’s Hospital, University of Toronto, 30 Bond Street Toronto, Ontario M5B 1W8, Canada. Phone: 416-864-5071; Fax: 416-864-6014. E-mail: hwanjoomd{at}yahoo.com

Purpose: Many types of tracheal tubes (TT) including silicone, polyvinylchloride (PVC) and armoured have been used for blind tracheal intubation (TI) via the intubating laryngeal mask airway (ILMA) and may cause trauma to the airway. We examined the maximal in vitro forces and pressures exerted by the tip of various TT as it exits the ILMA.

Methods: Silicone, PVC and armoured TT were studied. A #5 ILMA was secured on a wooden platform. With the use of a Harvard pump, force was applied to push the TT through the ILMA at 0.34 cm•sec–1. Forces exerted to push the TT and forces exerted by the TT tips on distal objects were calculated using proximal and distal pressure manometres. The areas of contact between the distal TT tips and the distal objects were measured by planimetry of an imprint. The final pressures exerted by the TT tips on a fixed distal object were calculated by dividing the forces exerted by the areas of contact.

Results: When compared to silicone and armoured TT, PVC TT exerted seven to ten times higher forces and pressures on distal objects. (P < 0.05). Heating PVC TT and inserting PVC TT with reverse curvature to the ILMA did not decrease the forces and pressures exerted by the distal tip.

Conclusion: The high forces and pressures exerted by PVC TT may theoretically contribute to increased morbidity to patients’ airway and esophagus. Caution should be exercised before attempting blind TI via the ILMA with a PVC TT.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Anesth. Analg.Home page
H. Joo and V. Naik
Conventional Tracheal Tubes for Intubation through the Intubating Laryngeal Mask Airway
Anesth. Analg., October 1, 2005; 101(4): 1245 - 1245.
[Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2002 by the Canadian Anesthesiologists' Society.