This Article Résumé de cet Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Submit a scholarly reply Alert me when this article is cited Alert me when eLetters are posted Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Pandin, P. Articles by d’Hollander, A. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Pandin, P. Articles by d’Hollander, A.

Sciatic nerve blockade in the supine position: a novel approach

[Le blocage du nerf sciatique en décubitus dorsal : une nouvelle approche]

From the Department of Anesthesiology, Erasmus Hospital, Free University of Brussels, Brussels Belgium.

Address correspondence to: Dr. Pierre C. Pandin, Department of Anesthesiology and Resuscitation, Erasmus Hospital, Lenniklaan 808, B-1070 Brussels, Belgium. Phone: 32-2-555-39-19; Fax: 32-2-555-43-63; E-mail: ppandin{at}ulb.ac.be

Purpose: Sciatic nerve block is useful for surgery below the knee both intra- and postoperatively. Several techniques to insert a catheter at the knee level or higher have been described but need mobilization (lateral decubitus) of the patient. We describe novel landmarks, using a high lateral approach, to block the sciatic nerve without moving the patient.

Clinical features: One hundred seven ASA I, II and III ASA patients scheduled for major foot or ankle surgery were studied prospectively. With patients awake and lying in the supine position, the catheter was introduced along novel landmarks in the peri-nervous adipose space using specifically designed material and nerve stimulation (< 0.5 mA). After a negative test dose (1% lidocaine with 1/200.000 epinephrine), 10 mL of 0.5% bupivacaine and 10 mL of 2% lidocaine were injected. Thirty minutes after performance of the block, the cutaneous and dermatomal sensory blockade were assessed using cold and pinprick tests while motor block was assessed using a modified Bromage scale. Complications and incidents were recorded. The tibial and superficial peroneal nerve were always blocked, while the deep peroneal and postero-femoral cutaneous nerves were blocked in only 97% and 83% of the patients, respectively. Anesthesia, was always present in the dermatome L5 and in the S1 dermatome in 98% of the patients. No major incidents or complications were noted. Three catheters could not be inserted and the anesthestic solution was injected through the needle.

Conclusion: The lateral technique for sciatic nerve anesthesia and catheter insertion allows patients to remain in the supine position for performance of the block and catheter insertion, and results in a high rate of homogeneous anesthesia and a low incidence of side effects.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				V. Domingo-Triado, S. Selfa, F. Martinez, D. Sanchez-Contreras, M. Reche, J. Tecles, M. T. Crespo, J. M. Palanca, and B. Moro Ultrasound Guidance for Lateral Midfemoral Sciatic Nerve Block: A Prospective, Comparative, Randomized Study Anesth. Analg., May 1, 2007; 104(5): 1270 - 1274. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]