CJA
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

This Article
Right arrow Résumé de cet Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a scholarly reply
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Luginbuehl, I. A.
Right arrow Articles by Bissonnette, B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Luginbuehl, I. A.
Right arrow Articles by Bissonnette, B.
Canadian Journal of Anesthesia 50:166-171 (2003)
© Canadian Anesthesiologists' Society, 2003

Obstetrical and Pediatric Anesthesia

Cerebrovascular reactivity to carbon dioxide is preserved during hypocapnia in children anesthetized with 1.0 MAC, but not with 1.5 MAC desflurane

[La réactivité cérébrovasculaire au gaz carbonique est conservée pendant l’hypocapnie chez des enfants anesthésiés avec 1,0 CAM, mais non avec 1,5 CAM, de desflurane]

Igor A. Luginbuehl, MD, Cengiz Karsli, BSc MD FRCPC and Bruno Bissonnette, BSc MD FRCPC

From the Department of Anaesthesia, The Hospital for Sick Children, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.

Address correspondence to: Dr. Bruno Bissonnette, Department of Anaesthesia, The Hospital for Sick Children, 555 University Avenue, Toronto, Ontario M5G 1X8, Canada. Phone: 416-813-7445; Fax: 416-813-7543, E-mail: bruno{at}anaes.sickkids.on.ca

Purpose: Maintenance of cerebrovascular reactivity to CO2 (CCO2R) is important during neurosurgical anesthesia. This study was designed to determine the effect of different desflurane concentrations on CCO2R in children.

Methods: Children undergoing urological surgery were enrolled. Anesthesia was induced with sevoflurane in air/oxygen. After intubation, sevoflurane was switched to desflurane. Analgesia was provided with an epidural neuraxial block. Mechanical ventilation was adjusted to an initial EtCO2 of 30 mmHg. Exogenous CO2 was used to achieve an EtCO2 of 40 and 50 mmHg. Patients were randomized to the sequence of desflurane concentration (1.0 and 1.5 MAC) and the EtCO2. Transcranial Doppler was used to measure middle cerebral artery blood flow velocity (Vmca). Five minutes were allowed to reach steady state after each change in EtCO2 and 15 min after changing the desflurane concentration.

Results: Sixteen patients were studied. The mean age and weight were 3.5 ± 1.5 yr and 14.4 ± 3.1 kg, respectively. Mean arterial pressure remained stable throughout the study, while at an EtCO2 of 50 mmHg, heart rate decreased at both desflurane concentrations (P < 0.05). At 1.0 MAC, Vmca increased from 30 to 40 mmHg (P < 0.05), but not from 40 to 50 mmHg EtCO2. At 1.5 MAC, Vmca increased between 30 and 50 mmHg (P < 0.05).

Conclusion: CCO2R is preserved during hypocapnia in children anesthetized with 1.0 MAC, but not with 1.5 MAC desflurane. The lack of further increase in Vmca at higher EtCO2 concentrations implies that desflurane may cause significant cerebral vasodilatation in children. This may have important implications in children with reduced intracranial compliance.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2003 by the Canadian Anesthesiologists' Society.