| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
sophagiennes du gradient valvulaire aortique - une étude de cas]

* From the Department of Anesthesiology, Perioperative and Pain Medicine, Brigham and Womens Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA; and
the Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Eberhard-Karls-University Tübingen, Germany.
Address correspondence to: Dr. Holger K. Eltzschig, Department of Anesthesiology, Perioperative and Pain Medicine, Brigham and Womens Hospital, Harvard Medical School, 75 Francis Street, Boston, Massachusetts 02115, USA. Phone: 617-732-8218; Fax: 617-730-9534; E-mail: heltzschig{at}partners.org
Purpose: Intraoperative measurement of the aortic valve (AV) gradient in patients undergoing cardiac surgery is routinely performed using transesophageal echocardiography (TEE). In patients with severe aortic stenosis (AS), TEE Doppler beam alignment with the blood flow through the stenotic valve may be inaccurate, resulting in an underestimation of the AV gradient. We describe here the use of epiaortic echocardiography as an alternative to TEE for the intraoperative evaluation of AS.
Clinical features: A patient diagnosed with severe AS (peak pressure gradient by transthoracic echocardiography: 108 mmHg) was undergoing AV replacement. In contrast, intraoperative TEE examination performed prior to bypass showed only a mild pressure gradient across the AV (peak pressure gradient: 38 mmHg). In order to resolve the conflicting information, epiaortic echocardiography was used to measure the AV gradient, confirming severe AS (peak pressure gradient: 98 mmHg). Most likely, Doppler beam alignment through the stenotic valve was more parallel to blood flow using epiaortic echocardiography, thus revealing the true pressure gradient.
Conclusion: Intraoperative epiaortic measurement of AV gradients can be successfully performed in patients where TEE may be inaccurate due to difficulty in aligning a Doppler beam with the transvalvular blood flow.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
P. Rosenberger, S. K. Shernan, M. Loffler, P. S. Shekar, J. A. Fox, J. K. Tuli, M. Nowak, and H. K. Eltzschig The Influence of Epiaortic Ultrasonography on Intraoperative Surgical Management in 6051 Cardiac Surgical Patients Ann. Thorac. Surg., February 1, 2008; 85(2): 548 - 553. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. T. Reeves, K. E. Glas, H. Eltzschig, J. P. Mathew, D. S. Rubenson, G. S. Hartman, S. K. Shernan, and For the Council for Intraoperative Echocardiograph Guidelines for Performing a Comprehensive Epicardial Echocardiography Examination: Recommendations of the American Society of Echocardiography and the Society of Cardiovascular Anesthesiologists Anesth. Analg., July 1, 2007; 105(1): 22 - 28. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. Rosenberger, S. K. Shernan, S. C. Body, and H. K. Eltzschig Visualization of Pulmonary Thromboemboli Using Epicardial Ultrasound Anesth. Analg., February 1, 2005; 100(2): 601 - 601. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |