| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
,
,
,¶
,

* From the Department of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Massachusetts, USA;
the Cognitive Engineering Laboratory, the Department of Mechanical and Industrial Engineering;
the Institute of Biomaterials and Biomedical Engineering,
the Department of Computer Science,
¶ the Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering; and
|| the Departments of Anesthesia Physiology and Physiology, Sunnybrook and Womens College Health Science Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Address correspondence to: Dr. Kim J. Vicente, Department of Mechanical & Industrial Engineering, University of Toronto, 5 Kings College Road, Toronto, Ontario M5G 3G8, Canada. Phone: 416-978-7399; E-mail: vicente{at}mie.utoronto.ca, URL: www.mie.utoronto.ca/labs/cel/
Purpose: To identify the factors that threaten patient safety when using patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) and to obtain an evidence-based estimate of the probability of death from user programming errors associated with PCA.
Clinical features: A 19-yr-old woman underwent Cesarean section and delivered a healthy infant. Postoperatively, morphine sulfate (2 mg bolus, lockout interval of six minutes, four-hour limit of 30 mg) was ordered, to be delivered by an Abbott Lifecare 4100 Plus II Infusion Pump. A drug cassette containing 1 mgmL-1 solution of morphine was unavailable, so the nurse used a cassette that contained a more concentrated solution (5 mgmL-1). 7.5 hr after the PCA was started, the patient was pronounced dead. Blood samples were obtained and autopsy showed a toxic concentration of morphine. The available evidence is consistent with a concentration programming error where morphine 1 mgmL-1 was entered instead of 5 mgmL-1. Based on a search of such incidents in the Food and Drug Administration MDR database and other sources and on a denominator of 22,000,000 provided by the device manufacturer, mortality from user programming errors with this device was estimated to be a low likelihood event (ranging from 1 in 33,000 to 1 in 338,800), but relatively numerous in absolute terms (ranging from 65667 deaths).
Conclusion: Anesthesiologists, nurses, human factors engineers, and device manufacturers can work together to enhance the safety of PCA pumps by redesigning user interfaces, drug cassettes, and hospital operating procedures to minimize programming errors and to enhance their detection before patients are harmed.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
D. J. Doyle and A. Keebler Another failure mechanism leading to patient-controlled analgesia overdoses Can J Anesth, May 1, 2008; 55(5): 319 - 320. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. W. Hicks, V. Sikirica, W. Nelson, J. R. Schein, and D. D. Cousins Medication errors involving patient-controlled analgesia Am. J. Health Syst. Pharm., March 1, 2008; 65(5): 429 - 440. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
F. J. Overdyk, R. Carter, R. R. Maddox, J. Callura, A. E. Herrin, and C. Henriquez Continuous Oximetry/Capnometry Monitoring Reveals Frequent Desaturation and Bradypnea During Patient-Controlled Analgesia Anesth. Analg., August 1, 2007; 105(2): 412 - 418. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. S. Hankin, J. Schein, J. A. Clark, and S. Panchal Adverse events involving intravenous patient-controlled analgesia Am. J. Health Syst. Pharm., July 15, 2007; 64(14): 1492 - 1499. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Grond, J. Hall, A. Spacek, M. Hoppenbrouwers, U. Richarz, and F. Bonnet Iontophoretic transdermal system using fentanyl compared with patient-controlled intravenous analgesia using morphine for postoperative pain management Br. J. Anaesth., June 1, 2007; 98(6): 806 - 815. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. J. Koo Addressing stakeholders' needs: Economics and patient satisfaction Am. J. Health Syst. Pharm., March 15, 2007; 64(6_Supplement_4): S11 - S15. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
I. Power Fentanyl HCl iontophoretic transdermal system (ITS): clinical application of iontophoretic technology in the management of acute postoperative pain Br. J. Anaesth., January 1, 2007; 98(1): 4 - 11. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. B. Wetterneck, K. A. Skibinski, T. L. Roberts, S. M. Kleppin, M. E. Schroeder, M. Enloe, S. S. Rough, A. S. Hundt, and P. Carayon Using failure mode and effects analysis to plan implementation of smart i.v. pump technology. Am. J. Health Syst. Pharm., August 15, 2006; 63(16): 1528 - 1538. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Syed, J. E. Paul, M. Hueftlein, M. Kampf, and R. F. McLean Morphine overdose from error propagation on an acute pain service: [Une surdose de morphine resultant de multiples erreurs dans un service de douleur aigue]. Can J Anesth, June 1, 2006; 53(6): 586 - 590. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. R. Viscusi, L. Reynolds, S. Tait, T. Melson, and L. E. Atkinson An Iontophoretic Fentanyl Patient-Activated Analgesic Delivery System for Postoperative Pain: A Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Trial Anesth. Analg., January 1, 2006; 102(1): 188 - 194. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. A. Grass Patient-Controlled Analgesia Anesth. Analg., November 1, 2005; 101(5S_Suppl): S44 - 61. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. J. S. Koo Postoperative pain management with a patient-controlled transdermal delivery system for fentanyl Am. J. Health Syst. Pharm., June 1, 2005; 62(11): 1171 - 1176. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. D. Kharasch Perioperative COX-2 Inhibitors: Knowledge and Challenges Anesth. Analg., January 1, 2004; 98(1): 1 - 3. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. J. Doyle Programming errors from patient-controlled analgesia Can J Anesth, October 1, 2003; 50(8): 855 - 856. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. D. Lamb Programming errors from patient-controlled analgesia Can J Anesth, October 1, 2003; 50(8): 856 - 856. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
W. Lederer and A. Benzer Programming errors from patient-controlled analgesia Can J Anesth, October 1, 2003; 50(8): 854 - 855. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
V. W. S. Chan Programming errors from patient-controlled analgesia Can J Anesth, October 1, 2003; 50(8): 856 - 856. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. J. Vicente, K. Kada-Bekhaled, G. Hillel, A. Cassano, and B. A. Orser REPLY Can J Anesth, October 1, 2003; 50(8): 856 - 857. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. G. Wade Patient safety in anesthesia - continuing challenges and opportunities/La securite du patient en anesthesie - possibilites et defis permanents Can J Anesth, April 1, 2003; 50(4): 319 - 322. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |