CJA
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

This Article
Right arrow Résumé de cet Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Additional material
Right arrow Submit a scholarly reply
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by VanDenKerkhof, E. G.
Right arrow Articles by Van Dijk, J. P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by VanDenKerkhof, E. G.
Right arrow Articles by Van Dijk, J. P.
Canadian Journal of Anesthesia 50:368-375 (2003)
© Canadian Anesthesiologists' Society, 2003

Regional Anesthesia and Pain

Using a personal digital assistant enhances gathering of patient data on an acute pain management service: a pilot study

[L’utilisation d’un assistant numérique personnel facilite la cueillette de données d’un service de traitement de la douleur aiguë : une étude pilote]

Elizabeth G. VanDenKerkhof, RN DRPH, David H. Goldstein, MB BCH MSc FRCPC, Jeremy Lane, MD, Michael J. Rimmer and Janice P. Van Dijk, RN MHSC

From the Department of Anesthesiology, Kingston General Hospital, Queen’s University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada.

Address correspondence to: Dr. Elizabeth G. VanDenKerkhof, Department of Anesthesiology, Kingston General Hospital, 76 Stuart St., Kingston, Ontario K7L 2V7, Canada. Phone: 613-549-6666, ext. 3964; Fax: 613-548-1375; Email: ev5{at}post.queensu.ca

Purpose: Handheld computer technology provides a unique opportunity for health care professionals to access real time or near real time patient information and evidence-based resources at the point-of-care. The purpose of this study was to assess one physician’s experience using acute pain assessment software on a personal digital assistant (PDA) to assess patients on an acute pain management service (APMS).

Methods: Using a historical control and a "time and motion" study design, comparisons were made on acute pain assessment time and comprehensiveness when patient assessments are documented on a PDA vs the current paper-based method.

Results: The study physician (a PDA-user) reported feeling comfortable with the assessment software after five patient assessments. PDA assessments were more likely to contain documentation regarding pain and side effects (e.g., nausea, pruritus, hypotension) than the paper assessments. The median time of the "assessment only" component of the patient encounter was 53 sec longer using the PDA compared to paper (P < 0.00), however, the median "total encounter" (chart review, assessment, documentation) time was 74 sec shorter using the PDA vs paper (P < 0.00).

Discussion: The findings of this preliminary study suggest that the PDA is a reliable tool that meets the data management requirements within an APMS setting. This study found that patient assessments documented using acute pain software developed for use on a PDA were as efficient and content-rich as paper assessments. The PDA may even enhance the efficiency of the patient assessment process through the provision of more comprehensive digital data for research, clinical, and administrative needs.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Am. Med. Inform. Assoc.Home page
C. E. Kuziemsky, J. H. Weber-Jahnke, F. Lau, and G. M. Downing
An Interdisciplinary Computer-based Information Tool for Palliative Severe Pain Management
J. Am. Med. Inform. Assoc., May 1, 2008; 15(3): 374 - 382.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Med Decis MakingHome page
F. Yu, T. K. Houston, M. N. Ray, D. Q. Garner, and E. S. Berner
Patterns of Use of Handheld Clinical Decision Support Tools in the Clinical Setting
Med Decis Making, December 1, 2007; 27(6): 744 - 753.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Anesth. Analg.Home page
E. G. VanDenKerkhof, D. H. Goldstein, W. C. Blaine, and M. J. Rimmer
A Comparison of Paper with Electronic Patient-Completed Questionnaires in a Preoperative Clinic
Anesth. Analg., October 1, 2005; 101(4): 1075 - 1080.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann Rheum DisHome page
T K Kvien, P Mowinckel, T Heiberg, K L Dammann, O Dale, G J Aanerud, T N Alme, and T Uhlig
Performance of health status measures with a pen based personal digital assistant
Ann Rheum Dis, October 1, 2005; 64(10): 1480 - 1484.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Am. Med. Inform. Assoc.Home page
L. Poissant, J. Pereira, R. Tamblyn, and Y. Kawasumi
The Impact of Electronic Health Records on Time Efficiency of Physicians and Nurses: A Systematic Review
J. Am. Med. Inform. Assoc., September 1, 2005; 12(5): 505 - 516.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am J Trop Med HygHome page
M. A. MISSINOU, C. H. O. OLOLA, S. ISSIFOU, P.-B. MATSIEGUI, A. A. ADEGNIKA, S. BORRMANN, D. WYPIJ, T. E. TAYLOR, and P. G. KREMSNER
SHORT REPORT: PILOTING PAPERLESS DATA ENTRY FOR CLINICAL RESEARCH IN AFRICA
Am J Trop Med Hyg, March 1, 2005; 72(3): 301 - 303.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Anesth. Analg.Home page
B. A. Finegan
Access Denied; Care Impaired: The Benefits of Having Online Medical Information Available at the Point-of-Care
Anesth. Analg., November 1, 2004; 99(5): 1450 - 1452.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Canadian J. AnesthesiaHome page
A. Con
PDA's: are we there yet?
Can J Anesth, January 1, 2004; 51(1): 91 - 91.
[Full Text]


Home page
Canadian J. AnesthesiaHome page
E. VanDenKerkhof, D. H. Goldstein, J. Lane, M. Rimmer, and J. Van Dijk
REPLY
Can J Anesth, January 1, 2004; 51(1): 91 - 92.
[Full Text]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2003 by the Canadian Anesthesiologists' Society.