| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
From the Department of Anesthesiology, Kingston General Hospital, Queens University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada.
Address correspondence to: Dr. Elizabeth G. VanDenKerkhof, Department of Anesthesiology, Kingston General Hospital, 76 Stuart St., Kingston, Ontario K7L 2V7, Canada. Phone: 613-549-6666, ext. 3964; Fax: 613-548-1375; Email: ev5{at}post.queensu.ca
Purpose: Handheld computer technology provides a unique opportunity for health care professionals to access real time or near real time patient information and evidence-based resources at the point-of-care. The purpose of this study was to assess one physicians experience using acute pain assessment software on a personal digital assistant (PDA) to assess patients on an acute pain management service (APMS).
Methods: Using a historical control and a "time and motion" study design, comparisons were made on acute pain assessment time and comprehensiveness when patient assessments are documented on a PDA vs the current paper-based method.
Results: The study physician (a PDA-user) reported feeling comfortable with the assessment software after five patient assessments. PDA assessments were more likely to contain documentation regarding pain and side effects (e.g., nausea, pruritus, hypotension) than the paper assessments. The median time of the "assessment only" component of the patient encounter was 53 sec longer using the PDA compared to paper (P < 0.00), however, the median "total encounter" (chart review, assessment, documentation) time was 74 sec shorter using the PDA vs paper (P < 0.00).
Discussion: The findings of this preliminary study suggest that the PDA is a reliable tool that meets the data management requirements within an APMS setting. This study found that patient assessments documented using acute pain software developed for use on a PDA were as efficient and content-rich as paper assessments. The PDA may even enhance the efficiency of the patient assessment process through the provision of more comprehensive digital data for research, clinical, and administrative needs.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
C. E. Kuziemsky, J. H. Weber-Jahnke, F. Lau, and G. M. Downing An Interdisciplinary Computer-based Information Tool for Palliative Severe Pain Management J. Am. Med. Inform. Assoc., May 1, 2008; 15(3): 374 - 382. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
F. Yu, T. K. Houston, M. N. Ray, D. Q. Garner, and E. S. Berner Patterns of Use of Handheld Clinical Decision Support Tools in the Clinical Setting Med Decis Making, December 1, 2007; 27(6): 744 - 753. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. G. VanDenKerkhof, D. H. Goldstein, W. C. Blaine, and M. J. Rimmer A Comparison of Paper with Electronic Patient-Completed Questionnaires in a Preoperative Clinic Anesth. Analg., October 1, 2005; 101(4): 1075 - 1080. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T K Kvien, P Mowinckel, T Heiberg, K L Dammann, O Dale, G J Aanerud, T N Alme, and T Uhlig Performance of health status measures with a pen based personal digital assistant Ann Rheum Dis, October 1, 2005; 64(10): 1480 - 1484. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. Poissant, J. Pereira, R. Tamblyn, and Y. Kawasumi The Impact of Electronic Health Records on Time Efficiency of Physicians and Nurses: A Systematic Review J. Am. Med. Inform. Assoc., September 1, 2005; 12(5): 505 - 516. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. A. MISSINOU, C. H. O. OLOLA, S. ISSIFOU, P.-B. MATSIEGUI, A. A. ADEGNIKA, S. BORRMANN, D. WYPIJ, T. E. TAYLOR, and P. G. KREMSNER SHORT REPORT: PILOTING PAPERLESS DATA ENTRY FOR CLINICAL RESEARCH IN AFRICA Am J Trop Med Hyg, March 1, 2005; 72(3): 301 - 303. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
B. A. Finegan Access Denied; Care Impaired: The Benefits of Having Online Medical Information Available at the Point-of-Care Anesth. Analg., November 1, 2004; 99(5): 1450 - 1452. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Con PDA's: are we there yet? Can J Anesth, January 1, 2004; 51(1): 91 - 91. [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
E. VanDenKerkhof, D. H. Goldstein, J. Lane, M. Rimmer, and J. Van Dijk REPLY Can J Anesth, January 1, 2004; 51(1): 91 - 92. [Full Text] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |