| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
From the Department of Anesthesia, Hospital Clinico San Carlos, Madrid, Spain.
Address correspondence to: Dr. Jose J. Arino, Department of Anesthesia, Hospital Clinico San Carlos, C/ Prof. Martin Lagos s/n, 28040 Madrid, Spain. Phone: 34-913303040; Fax: 34-913303039; E-mail: jarinoirujo{at}yahoo.es
Purpose: To compare the Macintosh (M), McCoy (MC), Miller (MIL), Belscope (BP) and Lee-Fiberview (LF) laryngoscopes with respect to the grade of laryngeal visualization and the difficulty of intubation.
Methods: We included 500 patients scheduled to undergo elective surgery and who required tracheal intubation. Patients were randomly assigned to five groups of 100 patients each. Anesthesia was induced intravenously using 13 mgkg-1 of propofol, fentanyl 1.5 µgkg-1 and atracurium 0.5 mgkg-1 or suxamethonium 1 mgkg-1. The laryngeal view was classified according to Cormack and Lehane. The degree of difficulty with intubation was rated as: Grade 1, intubation easy; Grade 2, intubation requiring an increased anterior lifting force and assistance to pull the right corner of the mouth upwards to increase space; Grade 3, intubation requiring multiple attempts and a curved stylet; Grade 4, failure to intubate with the assigned laryngoscope. Data were examined using analysis of variance,
2 or Fisher test, Students t test and odds ratio. P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.
Results: Laryngoscopic views obtained with the BP and MIL laryngoscopes were similar, and better than with the other types of laryngoscopes (P < 0.001). The levering tip of the MC blade (P = 0.02) and the fibreoptic device of the LF (P < 0.001) significantly improved the laryngoscopic view.
Regarding the degree of difficulty with intubation, the best results were obtained with the MC and M blades (P < 0.001).
Conclusion: Laryngoscopy was better with straight blades but curved blades provided better intubating conditions.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
O. Kimberger, L. Fischer, C. Plank, and N. Mayer Lower flange modification improves performance of the Macintosh, but not the Miller laryngoscope blade: [La modification de la partie inferieure du manche ameliore la performance de la lame du laryngoscope Macintosh, mais non celle du Miller.]. Can J Anesth, June 1, 2006; 53(6): 595 - 601. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. W. W. Cheung, M. G. Irwin, B. C. W. Law, and C. K. Chan A Clinical Comparison of the FlexibladeTM and Macintosh Laryngoscopes for Laryngeal Exposure in Anesthetized Adults Anesth. Analg., February 1, 2006; 102(2): 626 - 630. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Y.-C. P. Arai, K. Fukunaga, S. Hirota, and S. Fujimoto The Effects of Chin Lift and Jaw Thrust While in the Lateral Position on Stridor Score in Anesthetized Children with Adenotonsillar Hypertrophy Anesth. Analg., December 1, 2004; 99(6): 1638 - 1641. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. Komatsu, O. Nagata, K. Kamata, K. Yamagata, D. I. Sessler, and M. Ozaki Intubating laryngeal mask airway allows tracheal intubation when the cervical spine is immobilized by a rigid collar Br. J. Anaesth., November 1, 2004; 93(5): 655 - 659. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Al Shamaa, P. Jefferson, D. R. Ball, K. Nakazawa, D. Ikeda, S. Ishikawa, and K. Makita Lingual Tonsillar Hypertrophy: Airway Management Using Straight Blade Direct Laryngoscopy * Response Anesth. Analg., March 1, 2004; 98(3): 874 - 875. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. J. Arino, J. M. Velasco, C. Gasco, and F. Lopez-Timoneda REPLY Can J Anesth, December 1, 2003; 50(10): 1079 - 1079. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Lim, C. Demspey, and M. Pead Choosing a laryngoscope blade: straight vs curved Can J Anesth, December 1, 2003; 50(10): 1078 - 1079. [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
L. Miller To the Editor: Can J Anesth, December 1, 2003; 50(10): 1079 - 1080. [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
Another Showdown: Straight vs. Curved Blades for Intubation Journal Watch Emergency Medicine, July 15, 2003; 2003(715): 6 - 6. [Full Text] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |