CJA
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

This Article
Right arrow Résumé de cet Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a scholarly reply
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Olson, R. P.
Right arrow Articles by Gan, T. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Olson, R. P.
Right arrow Articles by Gan, T. J.
Canadian Journal of Anesthesia 50:553-557 (2003)
© Canadian Anesthesiologists' Society, 2003

General Anesthesia

Absence of adverse outcomes in hyperkalemic patients undergoing vascular access surgery

[Absence de complications chez des patients hyperkaliémiques devant subir une intervention chirurgicale d’accès vasculaire]

Ronald P. Olson, MD, Adam J. Schow, MD, Richard McCann, MD, David A. Lubarsky, MD MBA and Tong J. Gan, MD

From the Department of Anesthesiology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina, USA.

Address correspondence to: Dr. Ronald P. Olson, Department of Anesthesiology, Duke University Medical Center, Box 3094, Durham, NC 27710, USA. Phone: 919-684-2025; Fax: 919-681-8484; E-mail: olson012{at}mc.duke.edu

Purpose: The decision to cancel vascular access surgery because of hyperkalemia requires knowledge of the risks vs benefits. This study sought to identify and characterize cases where surgery had been performed in patients with uncorrected hyperkalemia.

Methods: One thousand four hundred and seventy-two consecutive cases of vascular access surgery at an academic medical centre between 1995 and 2000 by a single surgeon were analyzed retrospectively.

Results: Eight cases had clear documentation that the case proceeded with hyperkalemia. Anesthesia techniques were one general anesthetic, one regional block, five monitored anesthesia care (MAC), and one local infiltration only. Mean potassium was 6.9 mmol•L-1 (range 6.1–8.0). In this series of selected asymptomatic hyperkalemic patients undergoing low risk surgery, no adverse results occurred.

Conclusion: While this review of eight cases (only one receiving general anesthesia) cannot be used to prove the safety of proceeding to surgery with uncorrected hyperkalemia, it does suggest that asymptomatic hyperkalemia may not be an absolute contraindication to vascular access surgery.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2003 by the Canadian Anesthesiologists' Society.