CJA
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

This Article
Right arrow Résumé de cet Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a scholarly reply
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Lemay, E.
Right arrow Articles by Varin, F.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Lemay, E.
Right arrow Articles by Varin, F.
Canadian Journal of Anesthesia 50:562-567 (2003)
© Canadian Anesthesiologists' Society, 2003

Regional Anesthesia and Pain

The number of injections does not influence local anesthetic absorption after paravertebral blockade

[Le nombre d’injections n’influence pas l’absorption d’un anesthésique local après un bloc paravertébral]

Erik Lemay, MD FRCP(C)*, Joanne Guay, MD FRCP(C)*, Christiane Côté, RN*, Marie Claude Boivin, BSc{dagger} and France Varin, PhD{dagger}

* From the Department of Anesthesiology, Maisonneuve-Rosemont Hospital;
{dagger} and the Faculty of Pharmacy, University of Montreal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.

Address correspondence to: Dr Joanne Guay, Département d’anesthésie-réanimation, Hôpital Maisonneuve-Rosemont, 5415 boul. L’Assomption, Montréal, Québec H1T 2M4, Canada. Phone: 514-252-3426; Fax: 514-252-3542; E-mail: joanne.guay{at}umontreal.ca

Purpose: The aims of this study are to determine if the injection of a single large dose of local anesthetics into the paravertebral space increases the risks of inducing toxicity compared with multiple small injections and to describe ropivacaine plasma concentrations resulting from paravertebral blockade.

Methods: Paravertebral blockade was performed using a solution of 10 mL ropivacaine 0.75%, 10 mL lidocaine CO2 2% plus 0.1 mL epinephrine 1:1000 either by a single injection at T3 or T4 (Group S, n = 6) or by five injections of 4 mL each at T2 to T6 (Group M, n = 8). Blood samples were taken at zero, five, ten, 15, 20, 30, 45, 60 and 90 min and at two, three, four, five, six and eight hours. Ropivacaine and lidocaine plasma concentrations were measured by high performance liquid chromatography.

Results: Maximal plasma concentrations were comparable for lidocaine: 2.6 ± 1.3 (S) vs 2.6 ± 0.8 µg•mL-1 (M) and for ropivacaine: 1.3 ± 0.2 (S) vs 1.3 ± 0.1 µg•mL-1 (M). Area under the plasma concentration-time curve was higher in Group M for lidocaine: 577.6 ± 146.1 vs 401.7 ± 53.2 mg•min-1•mL-1 (P = 0.04) but similar for ropivacaine: 381.1 ± 95.4 (M) vs 363.1 ± 85.3 mg•min-1•mL-1 (S).

Conclusions: The injection of a single large bolus of local anesthetics into the paravertebral space does not increase its absorption. Maximal ropivacaine plasma concentrations resulting from paravertebral blockade are similar to those reported with equivalent doses of bupivacaine.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Canadian J. AnesthesiaHome page
E. Lemay, J. Guay, C. Cote, and Y. E. Leclerc
Le bloc paravertebral n'est pas une technique anesthesique de choix pour la chirurgie mammaire mineure en court sejour [Paravertebral blockade is not a suitable anesthetic technique for ambulatory minor breast surgery]
Can J Anesth, October 1, 2004; 51(8): 852 - 853.
[Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2003 by the Canadian Anesthesiologists' Society.