CJA
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

This Article
Right arrow Résumé de cet Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Additional Material
Right arrow Submit a scholarly reply
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Dillier, C. M.
Right arrow Articles by Weiss, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Dillier, C. M.
Right arrow Articles by Weiss, M.
Canadian Journal of Anesthesia 51:72-75 (2004)
© Canadian Anesthesiologists' Society, 2004

Obstetrical and Pediatric Anesthesia

Laryngeal damage due to an unexpectedly large and inappropriately designed cuffed pediatric tracheal tube in a 13-month-old child

[Lésion laryngée causée par un tube trachéal pédiatrique à ballonnet, mal conçu et trop grand, utilisé chez un enfant de 13 mois]

Claudia M. Dillier, MD*, Daniel Trachsel, MD{dagger}, Werner Baulig, MD{ddagger}, Claudine Gysin, MD§, Andreas C. Gerber, MD* and Markus Weiss, MD*

* From the Departments of Anesthesia,
{dagger} Intensive Care and Neonatology,
§ and Otorhinolaryngology, University Children’s Hospital;
{ddagger} and the Institute of Anesthesiology, University Hospital, Zurich, Switzerland.

Address correspondence to: Dr. Markus Weiss, Department of Anesthesia, University Children’s Hospital, Steinwiesstrasse 75, CH-8032 Zurich. Phone: +41 1 266 71 11; Fax: +41 1 266 79 94 ; E-mail: markus.weiss{at}kispi.unizh.ch

Purpose: To present a case of laryngeal damage in an infant caused by a too large and inappropriately designed cuffed tracheal tube.

Clinical features: A 13-month-old child undergoing cardiac surgery was intubated with an uncuffed endotracheal tube with an internal diameter (ID) of 4.0 mm. Because of an important air leak around the tracheal tube during mechanical ventilation, a cuffed endotracheal tube ID 4.0 mm was inserted. The air leak with the tube cuff not inflated was acceptable at 25 cm H2O airway pressure. After extubation on the third postoperative day, the patient showed increasing stridor and respiratory deterioration. Fibreoptic laryngoscopy of the spontaneously breathing patient showed a large intra-laryngeal web. After surgical removal of the web, the child rapidly recovered and was discharged from the hospital on the 12th postoperative day.

Inspection of the 4.0 mm (ID) cuffed tracheal tube revealed a cuff positioned inappropriately high and an increase of 0.7 mm in outer tube diameter compared to the 4.0 mm (ID) uncuffed tracheal tube from the same manufacturer. The tube cuff is likely to be situated within the larynx when placed in accordance to insertion depth formulas or radiological criteria, as used for uncuffed tracheal tubes in children.

Conclusion: The larger than expected tracheal tube with its intra-laryngeal cuff position in a 13-month-old child likely caused mucosal damage and an inflammatory reaction within the larynx resulting in granulation tissue formation and fibrous healing around the tracheal tube.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Br J AnaesthHome page
M. Weiss, A. Dullenkopf, S. Bottcher, A. Schmitz, K. Stutz, C. Gysin, and A. C. Gerber
Clinical evaluation of cuff and tube tip position in a newly designed paediatric preformed oral cuffed tracheal tube
Br. J. Anaesth., November 1, 2006; 97(5): 695 - 700.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Br J AnaesthHome page
M. Weiss, W. Knirsch, O. Kretschmar, A. Dullenkopf, M. Tomaske, C. Balmer, K. Stutz, A. C. Gerber, and F. Berger
Tracheal tube-tip displacement in children during head-neck movement--a radiological assessment
Br. J. Anaesth., April 1, 2006; 96(4): 486 - 491.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Canadian J. AnesthesiaHome page
R. G. Cox
Should cuffed endotracheal tubes be used routinely in children?/Les tubes endotracheaux a ballonnet devrait-ils etre utilises automatiquement chez les enfants ?
Can J Anesth, August 1, 2005; 52(7): 669 - 674.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Canadian J. AnesthesiaHome page
M. Weiss, C. Balmer, A. Dullenkopf, W. Knirsch, A. Ch. Gerber, U. Bauersfeld, and F. Berger
Intubation depth markings allow an improved positioning of endotracheal tubes in children: [Le marquage de la profondeur d'insertion permet d'ameliorer la mise en place de tubes endotracheaux chez les enfants]
Can J Anesth, August 1, 2005; 52(7): 721 - 726.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Br J AnaesthHome page
M. Weiss, A. C. Gerber, and A. Dullenkopf
Appropriate placement of intubation depth marks in a new cuffed paediatric tracheal tube
Br. J. Anaesth., January 1, 2005; 94(1): 80 - 87.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Canadian J. AnesthesiaHome page
T. Ezri, M. Weissenberg, O. Yanai, M. Sullam-Muggia, Z. Houri, and P. Szmuk
Internal or external diameter?
Can J Anesth, August 1, 2004; 51(7): 743 - 744.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Canadian J. AnesthesiaHome page
M. Weiss, C. M. Dillier, and A. C. Gerber
REPLY
Can J Anesth, August 1, 2004; 51(7): 744 - 744.
[Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2004 by the Canadian Anesthesiologists' Society.