CJA
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

This Article
Right arrow Résumé de cet Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a scholarly reply
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hemmerling, T. M.
Right arrow Articles by Donati, F.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Hemmerling, T. M.
Right arrow Articles by Donati, F.
Canadian Journal of Anesthesia 51:116-121 (2004)
© Canadian Anesthesiologists' Society, 2004

General Anesthesia

Comparison of phonomyography with balloon pressure mechanomyography to measure contractile force at the corrugator supercilii muscle

[Comparaison de la phonomyographie et de la mécanomyographie avec ballonnet sous pression pour mesurer la force contractile du muscle sourcilier]

Thomas M. Hemmerling, MD DEAA, Guillaume Michaud, Denis Babin, MSc, Guillaume Trager, DESS and François Donati, MD PhD FRCPC

From the Neuromuscular Research Group, Department of Anesthesiology, Centre hospitalier de l’université de Montréal (CHUM), Hôtel-Dieu, Université de Montréal, Montréal, Québec, Canada.

Address correspondence to: Dr. T.M. Hemmerling, Department of Anesthesiology, Centre hospitalier de l’université de Montréal (CHUM), Hôtel-Dieu, 3840 rue St. Urbain, Montréal, Québec H2W 1T8, Canada. Phone: 514-890-8000, ext. 14570; Fax: 514-412-7222; E-mail: thomashemmerling{at}hotmail.com

Purpose: Phonomyography is based on the creation of low frequency sounds during muscle contraction, which can be recorded and used for neuromuscular monitoring. In this study, balloon pressure mechanomyography, a novel method to measure the force of contraction via pressure changes in an air-filled balloon, was compared with phonomyography to determine neuromuscular blockade at the corrugator supercilii muscle.

Method: After approval of the Ethics Committee and informed consent, 15 patients were studied. A small condenser microphone was taped to the area just above the eyebrow for phonomyography; an air-filled balloon was taped to the area just above the opposite eyebrow. After induction of anesthesia using remifentanil and propofol, a laryngeal mask airway was inserted without the aid of neuromuscular blocking agents. The facial nerve was stimulated supramaximally with single-twitch stimulation (0.1 Hz) using superficial electrodes placed on both temporal areas for onset and train-of-four stimulation every 12 sec during offset of neuromuscular blockade produced by mivacurium 0.1 mg•kg-1. Onset and recovery measured by the two methods were compared using the t test and agreement between phonomyography and balloon pressure mechanomyography was examined using the Bland-Altman method.

Results: Onset, peak effect, and time to reach 25%, 75%, and 90% of control twitch response for phonomyography vs balloon pressure method were 83 ± 16 sec vs 81 ± 15 sec, 80 ± 15% vs 82 ± 17%, 7.7 ± 2.3 min vs 7.5 ± 2.4 min, 9.9 ± 4.1 min vs 10.5 ± 4 min, and 12.6 ± 4.3 min vs 13.1 ± 4.5 min respectively without being significantly different. Mean bias was 1% with limits of agreement of -9 and +9% of twitch height (T1).

Conclusion: We applied a balloon pressure method to measure the force at the corrugator supercilii. Phonomyography at the corrugator supercilii shows good agreement with this modified version of mechanomyography.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Br J AnaesthHome page
A. A. Dahaba, H. Bornemann, B. Holst, G. Wilfinger, and H. Metzler
Comparison of a new neuromuscular transmission monitor compressomyograph with mechanomyograph
Br. J. Anaesth., March 1, 2008; 100(3): 344 - 350.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Canadian J. AnesthesiaHome page
T. M. Hemmerling and N. Le
Brief review: Neuromuscular monitoring: an update for the clinician: [Article de synthese court : Monitorage neuromusculaire : une mise a jour pour le clinicien]
Can J Anesth, January 1, 2007; 54(1): 58 - 72.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Canadian J. AnesthesiaHome page
G. Trager, G. Michaud, S. Deschamps, and T. M. Hemmerling
Comparison of phonomyography, kinemyography and mechanomyography for neuromuscular monitoring: [Comparaison de la phonomyographie, la cinemyographie et la mecanomyographie pour le monitorage neuromusculaire]
Can J Anesth, February 1, 2006; 53(2): 130 - 135.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Br J AnaesthHome page
S. Deschamps, G. Trager, P. A. Mathieu, and T. M. Hemmerling
The staircase phenomenon at the corrugator supercilii muscle in comparison with the hand muscles
Br. J. Anaesth., September 1, 2005; 95(3): 372 - 376.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Canadian J. AnesthesiaHome page
L. Olivieri and G. Plourde
Prolonged (more than ten hours) neuromuscular blockade after cardiac surgery: report of two cases: [Un blocage neuromusculaire prolonge (plus de dix heures) apres une intervention en cardiochirurgie : presentation de deux cas]
Can J Anesth, January 1, 2005; 52(1): 88 - 93.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2004 by the Canadian Anesthesiologists' Society.