CJA
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

This Article
Right arrow Résumé de cet Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Additional Material
Right arrow Submit a scholarly reply
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Goldstein, D. H.
Right arrow Articles by Blaine, W. C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Goldstein, D. H.
Right arrow Articles by Blaine, W. C.
Canadian Journal of Anesthesia 51:231-235 (2004)
© Canadian Anesthesiologists' Society, 2004

Regional Anesthesia and Pain

Acute pain management services have progressed, albeit insufficiently in Canadian academic hospitals

[Les services de traitement de la douleur aiguë ont évolué, mais pas suffisamment, dans les hôpitaux universitaires canadiens]

David H. Goldstein, MB BCH MSc FRCPC, Elizabeth G. VanDenKerkhof, RN DRPH and William C. Blaine, BSc MSc

From the Department of Anesthesiology, Kingston General Hospital, Queen’s University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada.

Address correspondence to: Dr. David H. Goldstein, Department of Anesthesiology, Kingston General Hospital, 76 Stuart St., Kingston Ontario K7L 2V7, Canada. Phone: 613-549-6666, ext. 3399; Fax: 613-548-1375; E-mail: goldsted{at}kgh.kari.net

Purpose: Acute pain management services (APMS) evolved in response to the desire for improved management of postoperative pain. The management of postoperative pain received formal support from international organizations over the past decade and by 1993 half of the Canadian university-affiliated teaching hospitals had implemented an APMS. The purpose of this survey was to describe APMSs in Canadian academic institutions, with specific emphasis on postoperative analgesics, new analgesic methods, training and research.

Methods: Between June 2000 and January 2001, 62 Canadian hospitals affiliated with the 16 Canadian university anesthesiology departments were sent a postal questionnaire.

Results: Fifty of the 62 respondents returned a completed questionnaire representing a response rate of 81%. Eighty percent of the hospitals surveyed had at least 200 beds, 90% (45) had implemented an APMS. Anesthesiology was primarily responsible in all 45 hospitals with an APMS. The results presented are based on the 45 centres with an APMS.

Conclusion: Since the early 1990s the percent of Canadian academic hospitals with an APMS has increased from 53% to 92%. These figures are comparable to the United States. Greater collaboration from nursing and pharmacy, mandatory training for medical and nursing students and residents, and a standardized approach to continuous quality improvement remain necessary.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Canadian J. AnesthesiaHome page
A. Sinha and K. Brecht
44610 - ACUTE PAIN MANAGEMENT SERVICE (APMS) IN-HOUSE CLINICAL LIST - IF YOU HAVEN'T GOT A DATABASE YET
Can J Anesth, August 1, 2007; 54(suppl_1): 44610 - 44610.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Canadian J. AnesthesiaHome page
P. Beaulieu
Non-opioid strategies for acute pain management
Can J Anesth, June 1, 2007; 54(6): 481 - 485.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2004 by the Canadian Anesthesiologists' Society.