| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |

* From the Departments of Anaesthesia, Singapore General Hospital, and
the KK Women and Childrens Hospital, Singapore.
Address correspondence to: Dr. Sebastian M.H. Chua, Department of Anaesthesia, Singapore General Hospital, Outram Rd, Singapore 169608. Phone: 65-6321-4220; Fax: 65-6224-1792; E-mail: sebnjess{at}singnet.com.sg
Purpose: We compared the efficacy of epidural continual intermittent boluses (CIB) with a continuous epidural infusion (CEI) in prolonging labour analgesia induced by the combined spinal epidural (CSE) technique.
Methods: CSE was instituted in 42 nulliparous parturients at the L3 to 4 level with intrathecal (IT) fentanyl 25 µg followed by an epidural test dose of 3 mL of 1.5% lidocaine. These parturients were then randomly assigned to receive either epidural CIB (n = 21) or CEI (n = 21) with 0.1% ropivacaine and fentanyl 2 µg·mL1. For the CIB, 5 mL boluses were given hourly, with the first bolus 30 min postinduction. CEI at the rate of 5 mL·hr1 was initiated in the minute after CSE. The duration of analgesia, pain score, degree of sensorimotor block were compared.
Results: From Kaplan Meier survival analysis, the duration of analgesia was significantly longer in CIB (mean survival time 239 ± SD 24 min vs 181 ± 17, P < 0.05 using log rank test). During the first three hours postblock, the median sensory block to cold was higher in CIB (P < 0.05, Mann U Whitney test) but no difference in blood pressure was detected [P > 0.05, repeated measure analysis of variance (RMANOVA)]. The serial pain scores were lower in the CIB (P < 0.05, RMANOVA).
Conclusion: CIB prolonged the duration and improved the quality of analgesia. CIB could have resulted in an improved spread of analgesics in the epidural space or encouraged a direct passage of infusate into the IT space. This could have also rendered a higher sensory block to cold in the CIB group. CIB is a good alternative to CEI for the maintenance of epidural analgesia after CSE.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
A. T. Sia, Y. Lim, and C. Ocampo A Comparison of a Basal Infusion with Automated Mandatory Boluses in Parturient-Controlled Epidural Analgesia During Labor Anesth. Analg., March 1, 2007; 104(3): 673 - 678. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. D. W. Fettes, C. S. Moore, J. B. Whiteside, G. A. Mcleod, and J. A. W. Wildsmith Intermittent vs continuous administration of epidural ropivacaine with fentanyl for analgesia during labour Br. J. Anaesth., September 1, 2006; 97(3): 359 - 364. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. A. Wong, J. T. Ratliff, J. T. Sullivan, B. M. Scavone, P. Toledo, and R. J. McCarthy A randomized comparison of programmed intermittent epidural bolus with continuous epidural infusion for labor analgesia. Anesth. Analg., March 1, 2006; 102(3): 904 - 909. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. A.E. Shephard The changing pattern of anesthesia, 1954-2004: a review based on the content of the Canadian Journal of Anesthesia in its first half-century: [La transformation du modele de l'anesthesie, 1954-2004 : une revue fondee sur le contenu du premier demi-siecle du Journal canadien d'anesthesie] Can J Anesth, March 1, 2005; 52(3): 238 - 248. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |