| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
tus et le nouveau-né: une revue]
From the Department of Anesthesia, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada.
Address correspondence to: Dr. Judith Littleford, GH 611- Department of Anesthesia, Health Sciences Centre, 820 Sherbrook Street, Winnipeg, Manitoba R3A 1R9, Canada. Phone: 204-787-3796; Fax: 204-787-3656; E-mail: heyjude{at}mts.net
Purpose: To review the effects of maternal anesthesia and analgesia on the fetus and newborn.
Methods: An on-line computerized search of Medline, Embase, and the Cochrane Collaboration via PubMed was conducted. English language articles were selected. The bibliographies of relevant articles and additional material from other published sources were retrieved and reviewed.
Principal findings: No one test clearly separates the effects on the fetus/newborn, if any, of maternally administered medication during labour and delivery, or during surgery for non-obstetric indications. Supposition in this regard is limited in part by methodology previously used to study the transplacental passage of various drugs. This work needs to be repeated using a human model. Routine maternal supplemental oxygen administration is being questioned in light of research showing that free radical generation and oxidative stress are implicated as the underlying mechanisms in several neonatal conditions. Maternal hypotension is associated with neonatal acidemia and base excess correlates with neonatal outcome. Common postpartum analgesics transfer minimally into breast milk. Maternal or fetal surgery conducted during pregnancy necessitates modification of both anesthetic and surgical approaches. The key to resuscitation of the fetus is resuscitation of the mother: intra-uterine maneuvers, including perimortem Cesarean section, aim to reverse treatable causes of fetal asphyxia, restore fetal oxygenation, and correct fetal acidosis.
Conclusions: The well-being of the infant is a major criterion for evaluating the anesthetic management of pregnant women. Many tools exist to assist with this determination for the fetus, whereas few are available to evaluate the newborn.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
R. J. McClaine, K. Uemura, D. J. McClaine, K. Shimazutsu, S. G. de la Fuente, R. J. Manson, W. D. White, W. S. Eubanks, P. B. Benni, and J. D. Reynolds A Description of the Preterm Fetal Sheep Systemic and Central Responses to Maternal General Anesthesia Anesth. Analg., February 1, 2007; 104(2): 397 - 406. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
W. E. Benitz and M. L. Druzin Drugs That Affect Neonatal Resuscitation NeoReviews, April 1, 2005; 6(4): e189 - e195. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. A.E. Shephard The changing pattern of anesthesia, 1954-2004: a review based on the content of the Canadian Journal of Anesthesia in its first half-century: [La transformation du modele de l'anesthesie, 1954-2004 : une revue fondee sur le contenu du premier demi-siecle du Journal canadien d'anesthesie] Can J Anesth, March 1, 2005; 52(3): 238 - 248. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Guay Are non-depolarizing neuromuscular blocking agents innocuous for the neonates? Can J Anesth, February 1, 2005; 52(2): 213 - 213. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |