CJA
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

This Article
Right arrow Résumé de cet Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a scholarly reply
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Tsui, B. C.H.
Right arrow Articles by Finucane, B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Tsui, B. C.H.
Right arrow Articles by Finucane, B.
Canadian Journal of Anesthesia 51:690-695 (2004)
© Canadian Anesthesiologists' Society, 2004

Regional Anesthesia and Pain

The threshold current in the intrathecal space to elicit motor response is lower and does not overlap that in the epidural space: a porcine model

[Le courant seuil qui produit une réponse motrice est plus faible dans l’espace intrathécal que dans l’espace péridural et ne le chevauche pas: un modèle porcin]

Ban C.H. Tsui, MD MSc FRCPC, Alese Wagner, BSc and Brendan Finucane, MB CHB FRCPC

From the Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.

Address correspondence to: Dr. Ban C.H. Tsui, Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, University of Alberta Hospitals, 3B2.32 Walter Mackenzie Health Science Centre, 8440-112 Street, Edmonton, Alberta T6G 2B7, Canada. E-mail: btsui{at}ualberta.ca

Purpose: Using electrical epidural stimulation, a current of 1 to 10 mA is required to confirm the presence of the tip of an epidural catheter in the epidural space. The purpose of this study was to examine the hypothesis that the threshold current required to elicit a motor response in the intrathecal space is significantly lower than that in the epidural space in a porcine model.

Methods: Four 20-kg pigs were used in this experiment. Eighteen gauge, insulated, Tuohy needles were advanced into the epidural space using the loss of resistance technique at five different spinal levels in each pig. When the epidural space was entered, an electrical current was applied to the needle and increased progressively until a motor response was elicited. The needle was then further advanced until cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) was observed or until the needle had been advanced a maximum of 1 cm. At this point, the current was reapplied and increased until motor activity was evident.

Results: A total of 20 needles were inserted in four pigs. The current required to produce a motor response in the epidural space was 3.45 ± 0.73 mA (mean ± SD). The current required to produce a motor response in the intrathecal space (entry confirmed by the presence of CSF) was 0.38 ± 0.19 mA (mean ± SD). Two needles were advanced 1 cm without obtaining CSF but the current thresholds were similar to those obtained when CSF was evident (0.4 mA and 0.3 mA, respectively).

Conclusion: The threshold current of an insulated needle required to elicit a motor response in the intrathecal space, was significantly (P < 0.01) lower than that in the epidural space in a porcine model.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Anesth. Analg.Home page
B. C. H. Tsui
Epidural stimulation test criteria.
Anesth. Analg., September 1, 2006; 103(3): 775 - 776.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Anesth. Analg.Home page
B. C. H. Tsui
Is It Time to Perform All Thoracic Epidural Placements Under Fluoroscopy?
Anesth. Analg., May 1, 2006; 102(5): 1586 - 1586.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Canadian J. AnesthesiaHome page
P. Lena and R. Martin
Subdural placement of an epidural catheter detected by nerve stimulation: [Positionnement sous-dural d'un catheter epidural detecte par stimulation nerveuse et confirme par tomographie]
Can J Anesth, June 1, 2005; 52(6): 618 - 621.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Anesth. Analg.Home page
B. C. H. Tsui, D. Emery, R. R. E. Uwiera, and B. Finucane
The Use of Electrical Stimulation to Monitor Epidural Needle Advancement in a Porcine Model
Anesth. Analg., June 1, 2005; 100(6): 1611 - 1613.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Anesth. Analg.Home page
B. C.H. Tsui, A. M. Wagner, K. Cunningham, S. Perry, S. Desai, and R. Seal
Threshold Current of an Insulated Needle in the Intrathecal Space in Pediatric Patients
Anesth. Analg., March 1, 2005; 100(3): 662 - 665.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Canadian J. AnesthesiaHome page
S. A. Lang, C. Prusinkiewicz, and B. C.H. Tsui
Failed spinal anesthesia after a psoas compartment block: [L'echec de la rachianesthesie apres le bloc de la loge du psoas]
Can J Anesth, January 1, 2005; 52(1): 74 - 78.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2004 by the Canadian Anesthesiologists' Society.