CJA
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

This Article
Right arrow Résumé de cet Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Additional Material
Right arrow Submit a scholarly reply
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Bryson, G. L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Bryson, G. L.
Canadian Journal of Anesthesia 51:768-781 (2004)
© Canadian Anesthesiologists' Society, 2004

General Anesthesia

Patient selection in ambulatory anesthesia – An evidence-based review: part I

[La sélection des patients en anesthésie ambulatoire – Une revue factuelle : partie I]

Gregory L. Bryson, FRCPC MSC*, Frances Chung, MB FRCPC{dagger}, Barry A. Finegan, MB FRCPC{ddagger}, Zeev Friedman, MD§, Donald R. Miller, MD FRCPC*, Janet van Vlymen, MD FRCPC, Robin G. Cox, MB BS FRCA FRCPC||, Marie-Josée Crowe, MD FRCP**, John Fuller, MD FRCPC{dagger}{dagger} and Cynthia Henderson, MD FRCPC{ddagger}{ddagger} for the Canadian Ambulatory Anesthesia Research Education (CAARE) Group

* From the Department of Anesthesiology, The Ottawa Hospital, Ottawa, Ontario;
{dagger} Department of Anesthesia, Toronto Western Hospital, Toronto, Ontario;
{ddagger} Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta;
§ Department of Anesthesia, Mount Sinai Hospital, Toronto, Ontario;
Department of Anesthesiology, Kingston General Hospital, Kingston, Ontario;
|| Department of Anesthesia, Alberta Children’s Hospital, Calgary, Alberta;
** Département d’Anesthésiologie, Hôpital Ste-Justine, Montréal, Québec;
{dagger}{dagger} Department of Anesthesia and Perioperative Care, St. Joseph’s Health Care, London, Ontario; and
{ddagger}{ddagger} Department of Anesthesia, Vancouver General Hospital, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.

Address correspondence to: Dr. Gregory L Bryson, Department of Anesthesiology, Head, Pre-Admission Units, The Ottawa Hospital, 1053 Carling Avenue, Ottawa, Ontario K1Y 4E9, Canada. Phone: 613-761-4169; Fax: 613-761-5209; E-mail: glbryson{at}ottawahospital.on.ca

Purpose: To identify and characterize the evidence supporting decisions made in the care of patients with selected medical conditions undergoing ambulatory anesthesia and surgery. Conditions highlighted in this review include: the elderly, heart transplantation, hyper-reactive airway disease, coronary artery disease, and obstructive sleep apnea.

Source: A structured search of MEDLINE (1966–2003) was performed using keywords for ambulatory surgery and patient condition. Selected articles were assigned a level of evidence using Centre for Evidence Based Medicine (CEBM) criteria. Recommendations were also graded using CEBM criteria.

Principal findings: The elderly may safely undergo ambulatory surgery but are at increased risk for hemodynamic variation in the operating room. The heart transplant recipient is at increased risk of coronary artery disease and renal insufficiency and should undergo careful preoperative evaluation. The patient with reactive airway disease is at increased risk of minor respiratory complications and should be encouraged to quit smoking. The patient with coronary artery disease and recent myocardial infarction may undergo ambulatory surgery without stress testing if functional capacity is adequate. The patient with obstructive sleep apnea is at increased risk of difficult tracheal intubation but the likelihood of airway obstruction and apnea following ambulatory surgery is unknown.

Conclusion: Ambulatory anesthesia is infrequently associated with adverse outcomes, however, knowledge regarding specific patient conditions is of generally low quality. Few prospective trials are available to guide management decisions.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Anesth. Analg.Home page
F. Chung and N. Assmann
Car Accidents After Ambulatory Surgery in Patients Without an Escort
Anesth. Analg., March 1, 2008; 106(3): 817 - 820.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
American Journal of Medical QualityHome page
N. Menachemi, A. Chukmaitov, L. S. Brown, C. Saunders, and R. G. Brooks
Quality of Care Differs by Patient Characteristics: Outcome Disparities After Ambulatory Surgical Procedures
American Journal of Medical Quality, December 1, 2007; 22(6): 395 - 401.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Canadian J. AnesthesiaHome page
I. Abu-Shahwan, K. Chowdary, U. Schwarz, K. Murto, J. Kim, and W. Splinter
PATIENT SELECTION CRITERIA FOR AMBULATORY SURGERY IN CHILDREN
Can J Anesth, June 1, 2005; 52(suppl_1): A103 - A103.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Canadian J. AnesthesiaHome page
G. L. Bryson, F. Chung, R. G. Cox, M.-J. Crowe, J. Fuller, C. Henderson, B. A. Finegan, Z. Friedman, D. R. Miller, J. van Vlymen, et al.
Patient selection in ambulatory anesthesia - An evidence-based review: part II: [La selection des patients en anesthesie ambulatoire - Une revue factuelle : partie II]
Can J Anesth, October 1, 2004; 51(8): 782 - 794.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2004 by the Canadian Anesthesiologists' Society.