CJA
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

This Article
Right arrow Résumé de cet Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Additional Material
Right arrow Submit a scholarly reply
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Bryson, G. L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Bryson, G. L.
Canadian Journal of Anesthesia 51:782-794 (2004)
© Canadian Anesthesiologists' Society, 2004

General Anesthesia

Patient selection in ambulatory anesthesia – An evidence-based review: part II

[La sélection des patients en anesthésie ambulatoire – Une revue factuelle : partie II]

Gregory L. Bryson, MD FRCPC MSc*, Frances Chung, MB FRCPC{dagger}, Robin G. Cox, MB BS FRCA FRCPC{ddagger}, Marie-Josée Crowe, MD FRCP§, John Fuller, MD FRCPC, Cynthia Henderson, MD FRCPC||, Barry A. Finegan, MB FRCPC**, Zeev Friedman, MD{dagger}{dagger}, Donald R. Miller, MD FRCPC* and Janet van Vlymen, MD FRCPC{ddagger}{ddagger} for the Canadian Ambulatory Anesthesia Research Education (CAARE) Group

* From the Department of Anesthesiology, The Ottawa Hospital, Ottawa, Ontario;
{dagger} Department of Anesthesia, Toronto Western Hospital, Toronto; Ontario;
{ddagger} Department of Anesthesia, Alberta Children’s Hospital, Calgary, Alberta;
§ Département d’Anesthésiologie, Hôpital Ste-Justine, Montréal, Québec;
Department of Anesthesia and Perioperative Care, St. Joseph’s Health Care, London, Ontario;
|| Department of Anesthesia, Vancouver General Hospital, Vancouver, British Columbia;
** Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta;
** Department of Anesthesia, Mount Sinai Hospital, Toronto, Ontario;
{dagger}{dagger} Department of Anesthesiology, Kingston General Hospital, Kingston, Ontario, Canada.

Address correspondence to: Dr. Gregory L Bryson, Department of Anesthesiology, Head, Pre-Admission Units, The Ottawa Hospital, 1053 Carling Avenue, Ottawa, Ontario K1Y 4E9, Canada. Phone: 613-761-4169; Fax: 613-761-5209; E-mail:glbryson{at}ottawahospital.on.ca

Purpose: This is the second of two reviews evaluating the management of patients with selected medical conditions undergoing ambulatory anesthesia and surgery. Conditions highlighted in this review include: diabetes mellitus; morbid obesity; the ex-premature infant; the child with an upper respiratory infection; malignant hyperthermia; and the use of monoamine oxidase inhibitors.

Source: Medline search strategies and the framework for the evaluation of clinical evidence are presented in Part I.

Principal findings: Diabetes mellitus has not been linked with adverse events following ambulatory surgery. The morbidly obese patient is at an increased risk for minor respiratory complications in the perioperative period but these events do not increase unanticipated admissions. The ex-premature infant may be considered for ambulatory surgery if post-conceptual age is > 60 weeks and hematocrit is > 30%. The child with a recent upper respiratory tract infection is at an increased risk for perioperative respiratory complications, particularly if endotracheal intubation is required. Patients with malignant hyperthermia may undergo outpatient surgery but require four hours of postoperative temperature monitoring. Sporadic cases of drug interactions have been reported when meperidine and indirect-acting catecholamines are administered in the presence of monamine oxidase inhibitors. Ambulatory anesthesia and surgery is safe if these combinations of drugs are avoided.

Conclusion: Ambulatory anesthesia can be performed in, and is being offered to, a variety of patients with significant coexistent disease. In many cases there is little evidence documenting the outcomes expected in such patients. Prospective observational and interventional trials are required to better define perioperative management.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Anesth. Analg.Home page
F. Chung and N. Assmann
Car Accidents After Ambulatory Surgery in Patients Without an Escort
Anesth. Analg., March 1, 2008; 106(3): 817 - 820.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Canadian J. AnesthesiaHome page
I. T. Awad and F. Chung
Factors affecting recovery and discharge following ambulatory surgery: [Les facteurs influencant la recuperation et la sortie apres une operation en chirurgie ambulatoire].
Can J Anesth, September 1, 2006; 53(9): 858 - 872.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2004 by the Canadian Anesthesiologists' Society.