CJA
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

This Article
Right arrow Résumé de cet Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a scholarly reply
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Snider, D. D.
Right arrow Articles by Finucane, B. T.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Snider, D. D.
Right arrow Articles by Finucane, B. T.
Canadian Journal of Anesthesia 52:100-104 (2005)
© Canadian Anesthesiologists' Society, 2005

Cardiothoracic Anesthesia, Respiration and Airway

The "BURP" maneuver worsens the glottic view when applied in combination with cricoid pressure

[La manoeuvre PAHD, combinée à la compression cricoïdienne, dégrade la visualisation de la glotte]

Douglas D. Snider, FRCPC, Donna Clarke, RT and Brendan T. Finucane, MBBCH FRCPC

From the Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, University of Alberta Hospital, and the Department of Anesthesia, Misericordia Hospital, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.

Address correspondence to: Dr. Brendan T. Finucane, Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, University of Alberta, Clinical Sciences Building, Room 8-120, Edmonton, Alberta T6G 2G3, Canada. Phone: 780-407-2876; Fax: 780-407-7461; E-mail: bfinucan{at}ualberta.ca

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to determine if the application of a BURP maneuver to the cricoid cartilage would combine the benefits of both the BURP and the Sellick maneuvers, resulting in an improved glottic view and offer the potential of protection against passive gastric regurgitation.

Methods: This was a double-blind, prospective, randomized, crossover trial. Forty-three patients scheduled for elective surgery participated in this study. General anesthesia was induced using fentanyl, propofol and rocuronium. In a random sequence for each case and blinded to the laryngoscopist, one of three maneuvers was carried out. Direct vertical pressure, using 30 newtons, a BURP maneuver with cricoid pressure, or no pressure was applied to the cricoid and the laryngoscopic view was ascertained. A separate laryngoscopy was conducted for each maneuver and the views were graded as good (part of the glottis seen), poor (only the arytenoids were seen) or no view (only the epiglottis was seen). Endotracheal intubation was then performed in each case.

Results: The results showed that the combination of the BURP maneuver and cricoid pressure worsened the view obtained at laryngoscopy in 30% of cases (P = 0.007). Cricoid pressure alone worsened the view in 12.5% of cases (P = 0.279). No difference was seen in 65% of cases. All patients but one were intubated easily.

Conclusion: There is no benefit to routinely applying a modified "BURP" maneuver to the cricoid cartilage during rapid sequence induction of anesthesia.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
JWatch Emergency Med.Home page
To BURP or Not to BURP?
Journal Watch Emergency Medicine, April 13, 2005; 2005(413): 2 - 2.
[Full Text]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2005 by the Canadian Anesthesiologists' Society.