CJA
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

This Article
Right arrow Résumé de cet Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a scholarly reply
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Karamanlioglu, B.
Right arrow Articles by Ture, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Karamanlioglu, B.
Right arrow Articles by Ture, M.
Canadian Journal of Anesthesia 52:1047-1053 (2005)
© Canadian Anesthesiologists' Society, 2005

Regional Anesthesia and Pain

Infiltration with ropivacaine plus lornoxicam reduces postoperative pain and opioid consumption

[L’infiltration avec de la ropivacaïne, plus du lornoxicam, réduit la douleur postopératoire et la consommation d’opioïdes]

Beyhan Karamanlioglu, MD*, Alparslan Turan, MD*, Dilek Memis, MD*, Gaye Kaya, MD*, Sanem Ozata, MD* and Mevlut Ture, MD{dagger}

* From the Departments of Anesthesiology, and
{dagger} Biostatistics, Trakya University, Medical Faculty, Edirne, Turkey.

Address correspondence to: Dr. Beyhan Karamanlioglu, Trakya Üniversitesi Typ Fakültesi, Anesteziyolojive Reanimasyon AD, 22030, Edirne, Turkey. Fax: +90 284 235 80 96; E-mail: beykar{at}mynet.com

Purpose: To compare efficacy and patient outcome of wound infiltration with ropivacaine, lornoxicam, or their combination for control of pain following thyroid surgery.

Methods: Eighty patients underwent thyroid surgery were randomly assigned to one of four groups. Before skin closure, local tissues were infiltrated with 12 mL saline in Group S, with 10 mL of ropivacaine 0.75% plus 2 mL saline in Group R, with 2 mL of lornoxicam (8 mg) plus 10 mL saline in Group L, and with 10 mL ropivacaine 0.75% plus 2 mL lornoxicam (8 mg) in Group RL. Pain scores, total and incremental meperidine con-eight, 12, 18, and 24 hr postoperatively. Time to first analgesic requirement, patient satisfaction, and duration of hospital stay were also compared after surgery.

Results: The pain scores in Group RL were significantly lower in the first 12 hr than in Group S, and in the first four hours than in Groups R and L (P < 0.01). The time to first analgesic requirement was significantly longer (14.8 ± 8.4 hr vs 5.9 ± 5.2 hr; P < 0.01), the total pethidine consumption was significantly less than Group S (34.0 ± 33.0 mg vs 78.0 ± 29.8 mg; P<0.001), return of gastrointestinal function, ambulation time, length of hospital stay (P < 0.05) were significantly shorter, and patient satisfaction (P < 0.01) was significantly better in Group RL than in Group S (P < 0.05).

Conclusion: Wound infiltration with ropivacaine 0.75% plus lornoxicam 8 mg combination improved postoperative pain control and patient comfort, and decreased the need for opioids than the use of either drug alone.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Canadian J. AnesthesiaHome page
P. Beaulieu
Non-opioid strategies for acute pain management
Can J Anesth, June 1, 2007; 54(6): 481 - 485.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Br J AnaesthHome page
S. Sen, B. Ugur, O. N. Aydin, M. Ogurlu, E. Gezer, and O. Savk
The analgesic effect of lornoxicam when added to lidocaine for intravenous regional anaesthesia
Br. J. Anaesth., September 1, 2006; 97(3): 408 - 413.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2005 by the Canadian Anesthesiologists' Society.