This Article Résumé de cet Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Submit a scholarly reply Alert me when this article is cited Alert me when eLetters are posted Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Taha, S. Articles by Baraka, A. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Taha, S. Articles by Baraka, A.

Propofol is superior to thiopental for intubation without muscle relaxants

[Le propofol est supérieur au thiopental pour l’intubation sans myorelaxants]

From the Department of Anesthesiology, American University of Beirut Medical Center, Beirut, Lebanon.

Address correspondence to: Dr. Samar Taha, Associate Professor, Department of Anesthesiology, American University of Beirut Medical Center, P.O. Box 11 0236 Beirut, Beirut, Lebanon. Phone: 961 1 350000, ext. 6380; Fax: 961 1 744464; E-mail: st01{at}aub.edu.lb

Purpose: To compare intubating conditions and cardiovascular changes following induction of anesthesia and tracheal intubation in patients receiving either lidocaine-remifentanil-propofol or lidocaine-remifentanil-thiopental prior to induction.

Methods: In a randomized, double-blind study 76 healthy adult patients were assigned to one of two groups: lidocaine 1.5 mg·kg^–1, remifentanil 2 µg·kg^–1 and propofol 2 mg·kg^–1 (Group P) or lidocaine 1.5 mg·kg^–1, remifentanil 2 µg·kg^–1 and thiopental 5 mg·kg^–1 (Group T). Ninety seconds after the administration of the hypnotic agent, laryngoscopy and tracheal intubation were attempted. Intubating conditions were assessed as excellent, good or poor on the basis of ease of ventilation, jaw relaxation, position of the vocal cords, and patient’s response to intubation and slow inflation of the tracheal cuff. The mean arterial pressure (MAP) and heart rate (HR) were measured 45 sec after hypnotic agent administration, immediately after tracheal intubation, two and five minutes after intubation.

Results: Excellent intubating conditions were obtained in 84% of Group P patients and 50% of Group T patients (P < 0.05). The percentage decrease from baseline MAP was significantly higher in Group P than in Group T postinduction (27.4% ± 11.6 vs 21.8% ± 10.0) and immediately postintubation (19.0% ± 16.7 vs 11.2% ± 14.9). The percentage change from baseline HR was significantly higher in Group P than in Group T postinduction (13.8% ± 9.7 vs 0.5% ± 12.4), immediately postintubation (8.7% ± 13.7 vs 2.1% ± 13.1), and two minutes postintubation (7.04% ± 14.3 vs 3.5% ± 14.3).

Conclusion: Lidocaine-remifentanil-propofol is superior to lidocaine-remifentanil-thiopental for tracheal intubation without muscle relaxants. However, it induces more hypotension and bradycardia.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				H.-J. Park, J.-R. Lee, C. S. Kim, S. D. Kim, and H.-S. Kim Remifentanil Halves the EC50 of Propofol for Successful Insertion of the Laryngeal Mask Airway and Laryngeal Tube in Pediatric Patients Anesth. Analg., July 1, 2007; 105(1): 57 - 61. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				T. C. Mort Complications of Emergency Tracheal Intubation: Hemodynamic Alterations - Part I J Intensive Care Med, May 1, 2007; 22(3): 157 - 165. [Abstract] [PDF]

				M. H. Abou-Arab, T. Heier, and J. E. Caldwell Dose of alfentanil needed to obtain optimal intubation conditions during rapid-sequence induction of anaesthesia with thiopentone and rocuronium Br. J. Anaesth., May 1, 2007; 98(5): 604 - 610. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. M. Walz, M. Zayaruzny, and S. O. Heard Airway Management in Critical Illness Chest, February 1, 2007; 131(2): 608 - 620. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]