This Article Résumé de cet Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Submit a scholarly reply Alert me when this article is cited Alert me when eLetters are posted Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Larrabure, P. Articles by Vandesteene, A. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Larrabure, P. Articles by Vandesteene, A.

Tibial nerve block: evaluation of a novel midleg approach in 241 patients

[Le bloc du nerf tibial : évaluation d’une nouvelle approche chez 241 patients]

From the Department of Anesthesiology, Erasmus Hospital, Free University of Brussels, Brussels, Belgium.

Address correspondence to:: Dr. Pierre C. Pandin, Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, Erasmus Hospital, Lennik Drive 808, B-1070 Brussels, Belgium. Phone: +32 2 555 39 19; Fax: +32 2 555 43 63; E-mail: ppandin{at}ulb.ac.be

Purpose: Several techniques of tibial nerve (TN) block have been described but require mobilization of the patient. We describe a new landmark, along the internal tibial shaft edge at the midleg level, that allows to block the TN and to insert a catheter with the patient lying supine.

Methods: 241 ASA physical status I to III awake, supine patients were studied prospectively. Cutaneous projections of the internal tibial condyle and the internal malleolus were marked and the needle was inserted 45° cephalad in an antero-posterior plane, midway on the line between those two points, 1 cm posterior to the tibial shaft’s internal edge. The catheter was introduced in the peri-nervous space using nerve stimulation (< 0.5 mA) on both the Tuohy needle and catheter. Ten millilitres of 2% lidocaine were injected through the catheter. Cutaneous and dermatomal sensory blockade were assessed using cold and pinprick tests while motor block was assessed using a modified Bromage scale. Satisfaction and analgesia scores were noted after surgery for 48 hr. Adverse events were recorded.

Results: The TN was always blocked, matching the distal L5 cutaneous nerve supply. Blood reflux was present in five patients (needle or catheter). No additional adverse events were noted. During the initial postoperative 48 hr, 0.2% ropivacaine was infused through the catheter (5 mL·hr^–1) which always provided effective pain relief.

Conclusion: The midleg technique of TN anesthesia and catheter insertion allows patients to remain in the supine position and results in a high rate of homogeneous anesthesia, a low incidence of side effects and effective continuous analgesia.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				R. Doty Jr, R. Sukhani, M. C. Kendall, E. Yaghmour, A. Nader, A. Brodskaia, T. C. Kataria, and R. McCarthy Evaluation of a Proximal Block Site and the Use of Nerve-Stimulator-Guided Needle Placement for Posterior Tibial Nerve Block Anesth. Analg., November 1, 2006; 103(5): 1300 - 1305. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]