CJA
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

This Article
Right arrow Résumé de cet Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Additional Material
Right arrow Submit a scholarly reply
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hamard, F.
Right arrow Articles by Laffon, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Hamard, F.
Right arrow Articles by Laffon, M.
Canadian Journal of Anesthesia 52:421-427 (2005)
© Canadian Anesthesiologists' Society, 2005

Cardiothoracic Anesthesia, Respiration and Airway

La sédation au propofol permet l’intubation difficile vigile avec le masque laryngé FastrachTM

[Propofol sedation allows awake intubation of the difficult airway with the FastrachTM LMA]

Franck Hamard, MD, Martine Ferrandiere, MD, Xavier Sauvagnac, MD, Jean Christophe Mangin, MD, Jacques Fusciardi, MD, Colette Mercier, MD and Marc Laffon, MD

Du Groupement d’Anesthésie et de Réanimation Chirurgicale, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Tours, Tours, France.

Adresser la correspondance à: Dr Franck Hamard, Service d’anesthésie réanimation chirurgicale, Centre hospitalier universitaire de Tours, 2 boulevard Tonnelé, 37000 Tours, France. Téléphone : 02 47 47 38 10 ; Télécopieur : 02 47 47 46 60; Courriel : hamardf{at}voila.fr

Purpose: To evaluate target controlled infusion anesthesia (TCI) with propofol for conscious intubation [(Ramsay score equal to 3 (RS 3)] through the FastrachTM laryngeal mask airway (LMA)

Methods: 17 consenting and unpremedicated patients, who showed criteria for difficult intubation (score developed by Arné et al. ≥ 11), were monitored and received supplemental oxygen. Propofol was administered by TCI, with successive targets of 0.6 and 1 µg·mL–1, while the RS was evaluated: if = 3, LMA intubation was attempted, if < 3 the TCI was increased by steps of 0.2 µg·mL–1 until an RS of 3 was reached. Local anesthesia (lidocaine 5%) of the oropharynx was carried out at 0.6 and 1 µg·mL–1, together with local anesthesia of the nasopharynx at 1 µg·mL–1. A standardized questionnaire evaluated memory of and satisfaction with the technique (score/10) on postoperative day 1.

Results: The LMA was inserted in 100% of cases and intubation was successful in 16 out of 17 cases (one failure). The propofol target concentration to obtain a RS of 3 was 1.25 ± 0.07 µg·mL–1. Amnesia occurred as soon as the target concentration of propofol exceeded 1 µg·mL–1. The patients found the technique very satisfactory (median satisfaction score = 9.4/10). Incidents of coughing or nausea were observed in 47% and 5% of cases respectively. There was no oesophageal intubation and no desaturation (Sp02 < 95%).

Conclusion: Propofol administered by TCI to achieve a RS of 3 allows conscious intubation to be performed through a LMA under satisfactory conditions. A LMA could be a possible alternative to a "conscious" fibroscopy.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Br J AnaesthHome page
T. M. Cook, M. Asif, R. Sim, and J. Waldron
Use of a ProSealTM laryngeal mask airway and a Ravussin cricothyroidotomy needle in the management of laryngeal and subglottic stenosis causing upper airway obstruction
Br. J. Anaesth., October 1, 2005; 95(4): 554 - 557.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2005 by the Canadian Anesthesiologists' Society.